This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice - 1:6.1.2-0ubuntu1.1
---
libreoffice (1:6.1.2-0ubuntu1.1) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Make LibreOffice under the LXQt desktop environment use the Breeze theme
as the default (LP: #1799001).
* Backport a patch from upstream which
autopkgtests for libreoffice 1:6.1.2-0ubuntu1.1 in cosmic-proposed all
passed (see http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libreoffice).
Based on this, marking verified.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic
** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Hello Olivier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into cosmic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:6.1.2-0ubuntu1.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Distro-patched until this is properly addressed upstream:
https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/commit/?id=d60f679564874dfd19479293e4864974885b4b19
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because
Thanks Olivier,
I confirm your test results: ignoring the DocumentView$1.class is fine
with both openjdk-10 and openjdk-11.
I agree that JEP-181 is the most probable cause as to why this access
bridge class is no longer generated - there's a small discussion on why
access bridge classes were
The autopkgtest failures were temporarily ignored to allow openjdk 11 to
enter the archive: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney
/hints-ubuntu/revision/3296
This still needs fixing in libreoffice.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
Change submitted upstream for discussion:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/61607/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796361
Title:
autopkgtests fail with openjdk
Rebuilding libreoffice against OpenJDK 11 shouldn't make any difference.
The failing test invokes /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/javac to compile
java files in
/usr/lib/libreoffice/sdk/examples/DevelopersGuide/OfficeDev/DesktopEnvironment/,
and then tries to bundle the resulting class files into a
Is this still seen once you rebuild LO with OpenJDK 11?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796361
Title:
autopkgtests fail with openjdk 11~28-3ubuntu1 in
I'm not fluent in java, but reading the source (DocumentView.java) I
cannot see any anonymous inner class definitions. And indeed if I
disassemble DocumentView$1.class that was generated with OpenJDK 10, it
looks pretty much empty:
$ javap
DocumentView$1.class is supposed to hold an anonymous inner class, and
it looks like with the updated openjdk this file is not generated. I
wonder whether that's an openjdk regression, or a change in how the jdk
compiles java classes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This could possibly be a consequence of
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/181.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796361
Title:
autopkgtests fail with openjdk
I was able to get the tests passing with the following change:
--- odk/examples/DevelopersGuide/OfficeDev/DesktopEnvironment/Makefile.orig
2018-10-05 18:45:40.169292599 +0200
+++ odk/examples/DevelopersGuide/OfficeDev/DesktopEnvironment/Makefile
2018-10-05 18:45:46.417351542 +0200
@@ -66,7
14 matches
Mail list logo
