The verification of the Stable Release Update for fonts-noto-color-emoji has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-noto-color-emoji in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926047 Title: [SRU 🪱] Update to 20200916 (to support missing emojis from unicode 13.1) Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji source package in Focal: Fix Released Bug description: [ Impact ] Many new emoji supported by various social platforms are not currently visible in Ubuntu 20.04, because of old font (even though the shipped ICU supports this version). here's a list for Unicode 13.0 and 13.1: - https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.0/ - https://emojipedia.org/emoji-13.1/ [ Test Plan ] 1. After installing the update, visit https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-emoji-list.html The browser column should match the Google column 2. You can also use the Characters app shipped by default to verify that the emoji seem to work ok. This sentence should end asking "what do you want?" in the Italian way: 🤌 [ Regression potential ] Emoji using a different composition not supported by 20.04 may show as multiple icons instead than as a single emoji. No emoji are shown when they used to be visible. This is easily comparable using https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/full- emoji-list.html where "Google" should match "Browser". python3-nototools has no rdepends and the only one Build-Depend is fonts-noto-color-emoji itself, so updating it has no effect either. Even though in this case is not needed. The design of some icons has been updated (compare browser with google columns at https://i.imgur.com/HkA3kOz.jpg), overall the look is consistent though and given that these are not part of any documentation or relevant component it's not something that needs an UFe. -- Note: Building the package with focal version of nototools is fine because fonts-noto-color-emoji depends on newer version only for tests and metadata checks which is not needed by our builds. This can be easily checked by diffing the resulting ttf extracting the data with ttx, which is in fact matching (for what it concerns real data). PPA for testing: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4534 A previous discussion on this was also done as part of bug #1870794 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-emoji/+bug/1926047/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
