[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1932973] Re: package libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

2023-04-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for libreoffice (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1932973] Re: package libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

2023-02-27 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Please try running the following command and let us know whether that fixes the problem: sudo apt install --reinstall libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Pac

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1932973] Re: package libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

2021-06-22 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932973 Title: package libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1932973] Re: package libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3 1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

2021-06-22 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile