I'm unsubscribing the ubuntu-sponsors team as this has already been
sponsored albeit rejected by Robie. However, the package can still be
accepted from the rejected queue once the bug description has been
squared away. I've subscribed to the bug and will accept the package
once the SRU information
On 2021-10-20 22:58, Dani Llewellyn wrote:
> There are zero changes made to the strings themselves, only the line
> numbers used to generate the templates changed.
Thanks for explaining. Apparently I didn't look close enough. :/
Then I suppose we'd better use your small debdiff also for impish (o
The localisation changes were adjusting the translation files to match
the line numbers of the amended python source code. It was picked up
accidentally by my compiling in the checked-out source when testing the
fix - the compile generated new templates with the change. There are
zero changes made
It looks like also bug #1926697 is coincidentally about to be fixed
through the fix of this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499
Title:
installation of deb-pack
My understanding is that it was intended for impish as well. If so, can
somebody (@Norbert, @Martin, anyone...) please edit the bug description
to comply with the SRU template:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template
Another thing: When uploading to Debian, I picked Dani's s
@Nikola: If that issue happened also in 21.04, it's not the same issue
as the one dealt with in this bug report. The latter is about a
regression due to an upgrade of vte2.91.
So you may want to submit a new bug report (with more details, exact
error messages, etc.).
--
You received this bug not
When I do right-click on .deb package and open it with Gdebi-gtk,
and try to install a package on 21.10 (also used to happen od 21.04)
program closes.
I have downloaded 0.9.5.7+nmu6 and I think I have built it with dpkg-
buildpackage - us -uc and still happens the same.
0.9.5.7+nmu6 works of
This bug was fixed in the package gdebi - 0.9.5.7+nmu6
---
gdebi (0.9.5.7+nmu6) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload
[ Christian Ehrhardt ]
* GDebi/GDebiGtk.py:
- Don't call gio_copy_in_place if there is no path / uri being
passed (LP: #1931394, closes: #9
** Changed in: gdebi (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499
Title:
installation of deb-packages with gdebi-gtk
I just uploaded Dani's gdebi fix to Debian unstable. Tested it in a PPA
first:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/gdebi/+packages
With that, and for impish+1, we will be able to sync the source from
Debian for both gdebi and vte2.91.
The gdebi change must of course be SRUed to impis
** Changed in: gdebi (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499
Title:
installation of deb-packages with gdebi-gtk sho
** No longer affects: ubuntu-mate-meta (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-mate
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: gdebi (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: gdebi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: gdebi (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged =>
The attachment "Patch to drop ubuntu-specific hack from gdebi because it
is not needed any more" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team
has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and
hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please
remove the "pat
Great. So there is no need in my PPA. I have deleted it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499
Title:
installation of deb-packages with gdebi-gtk shows "dpkg: error:
For Norbert, this is the same debdiff without the localisation changes
** Patch added: "gdebi-no-ubuntu-specfics.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/1946499/+attachment/5532985/+files/gdebi-no-ubuntu-specfics.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you
Thanks.
I have packaged old VTE from Hirsute in the PPA (
https://launchpad.net/~nrbrtx/+archive/ubuntu/vte-impish ).
```
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:nrbrtx/vte-impish
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
```
will fix the issue temporarily.
--
You received this bug notification becaus
@Dani: Needless to say I didn't see your patch before submitting my
latest comment.
This sounds very promising! :) And suddenly I understand why gdebi
behaves differently in Ubuntu compared to Debian...
Will test is in a minute.
And yes, this means that we can simply start sync'ing vte2.91 from
https://launchpad.net/~diddledani/+archive/ubuntu/gdebi-
fix-1946499/+packages contains my patch above (the debdiff of gdebi) for
reference once it's built by LP.
I agree that downgrading VTE is not gonna fly. We might be able to
convince SRU managers to rebuild without the patch now it's not need
The downgrade idea would need to be approved by some leading member of
Ubuntu's desktop team, and since 21.10 is released today, also the SRU
team would need to approve it. (You already know what I think the answer
will be.)
It's correct that I have helped with some routine packaging of VTE a
coup
With this patch we can drop the 91_keep_fds.patch in vte
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499
Title:
installation of deb-packages with gdebi-gtk shows "dpkg: error:
Identical to patch added to #1756238.
** Patch added: "Patch to drop ubuntu-specific hack from gdebi because it is
not needed any more"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdebi/+bug/1946499/+attachment/5532964/+files/gdebi-no-ubuntu-specfics.debdiff
--
You received this bug notificat
Dear Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)!
I agree. But the VTE package is maintained or signed by yours signature as
shown in its changelog
(http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/v/vte2.91/vte2.91_0.64.2-1ubuntu1/changelog).
Then please do this work with 100% effort. You make Ubuntu better
Please.. Downgrading VTE for this reason won't happen. Many other
packages are built with the latest version (running "apt rdepends
libvte-2.91-0" gives you a hint).
Rewriting the patch or fix gdebi so the patch isn't needed on Ubuntu are
two reasonable options. If you want to help fix this, pleas
Possible way to compile VTE version from Hirsute on Impish is the
following:
```
sudo sed -i "s/# deb-src/deb-src/g" /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
sudo apt-get build-dep vte2.91
cd /tmp
apt-get source vte2.91
cd ~/Downloads
wget
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ub
On 2021-10-14 12:31, Norbert wrote:
> Tried to compile package from debian bookworm
That was one of the first things I tried, but IIRC I still got the
"unable to read filedescriptor flags" error. Which is a bit weird,
considering that it works in a Debian environment.
> Then when `gdebi-gtk file.
Tried to compile package from debian bookworm as follows:
```
sudo sed -i "s/# deb-src/deb-src/g" /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
sudo apt-get build-dep vte2.91
cd ~/Downloads
wget http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/v/vte2.91/vte2.91_0.64.2.orig.tar.gz
tar
The following method of VTE compilation does not work:
```
sudo sed -i "s/# deb-src/deb-src/g" /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
sudo apt-get build-dep vte2.91
cd ~/Downloads
wget
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/v/vte2.91/vte2.91_0.62.3.orig.tar.gz
ta
Probably not. The hirsute version of vte2.91 does not even build on
impish.
For gdebi-gtk to keep working, somebody probably needs to
* rewrite 91_keep_fds.patch, or
* fix gdebi so it works without that patch.
Also I can't stop wondering why gdebi-gtk works on Debian testing
without 91_keep_fds
Downgrading VTE to hirsute's version solves the issue. Could anyone
downgrade it for Impish?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499
Title:
installation of deb-packages
A related comment in #ubuntu-desktop:
https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/10/12/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t15:12
** Changed in: vte2.91 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is sub
This is an attempt at a fix which does not work:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/vte2.91/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499
Title:
insta
Confirmed that gdebi-gtk works on Debian testing (without
91_keep_fds.patch). So the need for that patch is Ubuntu specific
somehow. (Not sure how that helps, but I thought it was worth checking.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscri
Hi!
I can confirm the problem with gdebi-gtk, as already described by
Norbert.
The patch is apparently a workaround since nobody has had the time to
adapt gdebi. My refresh in the latest Ubuntu upload of vte2.91 was a
minimum change to make it still apply after upstream had made changes.
Maybe I
It fails, see screen-cast, this is with latest gdebi and latest VTE from
Impish.
Proposed is not enabled (if this matters).
```
$ dpkg -l | grep -E "vte|gdebi"
ii gdebi0.9.5.7+nmu5ubuntu1
all simple tool to view and install deb files
The only difference in 91_keep_fds.patch between vte2.91
(0.62.3-1ubuntu1) and vte2.91 (0.64.2-1ubuntu1) is this:
164,165c164,165
< auto op = new vte::base::SpawnOperation{spawn_context_from_args(pty,
<
working_dire
From the recent changelog I see 91_keep_fds.patch in vte2.91 was
refreshed.
vte2.91 (0.64.2-1ubuntu1) impish; urgency=medium
* Merge with debian experimental. Remaining changes:
- Add 91_keep_fds.patch since gdebi still requires it (LP: #1756238)
- Breaks/Replaces with libvte-2.91-0 (<=
** Also affects: ubuntu-mate-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-mate-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte2.91 in Ubuntu.
https://bu
As 3 years before in bug 1756238 the root of the problem is VTE library.
Downgrading VTE to version 2.91_0.62.3-1ubuntu1 (
https://packages.ubuntu.com/source/hirsute/vte2.91 ) fixes the issue.
** Also affects: vte2.91 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: vte2.91 (U
38 matches
Mail list logo