As the comments have indicated, updates have solved this issue.

** Changed in: gnome-utils (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638018

Title:
  gnome-system-log aborts when filter are applied to big log files

Status in gnome-utils - GNOME Desktop Utilities:
  Fix Released
Status in “gnome-utils” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gnome-utils

  I can reproduce a crash of gnome-system-log 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 (Lucid):

  1. start gnome-system-log and it shows (a quite big) /var/log/messages
  2. activate a simple user-defined filter, e.g. to match "EE" (without the 
quotes)
  3. enable "Show matches only"
  => it aborts:

  ../~$ gnome-system-log

  (gnome-system-log:4880): Gtk-WARNING **:
  /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.20.1/gtk/gtktextbtree.c:4019: byte index off
  the end of the line

  Gtk-ERROR **: Byte index 227444 is off the end of the line
  aborting...
  Aborted
  ../~$ 

  If I do this with /var/log/lpr or other small log files, it works as
  expected. With big files like messages or syslog it crashes. My
  /var/log/message is 2.6 MByte.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: gnome-utils 2.30.0-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.42-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Tue Sep 14 14:32:28 2010
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=de_CH.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-utils

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-utils/+bug/638018/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to