Problem with the "user accounts" and libglib2.0 libraries in version
0.3-ubuntu4 - after update oneiric. ADM Architecture. The libraries are
not left libglib2.0 reinstall. I think the bug should be reopened
because the problem is back with version 0.3 ubuntu4.
--
You received this bug notificatio
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-desktop/glib/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
Status in “glib2.0” package in Ubuntu:
Fi
This bug was fixed in the package glib2.0 - 2.30.0-0ubuntu3
---
glib2.0 (2.30.0-0ubuntu3) oneiric; urgency=low
* debian/libglib2.0-data.preinst:
- fix upgrade issue caused by a leftover symlink (LP: #854622)
-- Michael VogtFri, 30 Sep 2011 21:21:42 +0200
** Changed in: gli
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
Status in “gli
Hey Michael.
I see this as well and we got some dupes, I think this is something
real. Feel free to clean it up manually of course to get your box
working again, but I think this bug is very real.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subsc
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Michael Nelson
wrote:
>
> Not that I'm aware of (see below), but it is possible that I've sudo'd
> a symlink at some point - I don't remember doing so, and don't see why
> I would have (we do most our dev work in a virtualenv), but I guess
> I'm trying to say don'
Steve Langasek [2011-09-30 5:37 -]:
> So glib2.0 needs to clean up its historic mis-migration.
Hmm, the preinst files do
if [ "$1" = "upgrade" ] && dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt-nl 2.27.5-2; then
rm -f /usr/share/doc/libglib2.0-dev
fi
I. e. correctly use lt-nl (thus don't fire on fres
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Please show 'ls -ld /usr/share/doc/libglib2.0*'. I'm pretty sure one of
> the directories is wrongly symlinked to the other, which means that
> unpacking libglib2.0-data after libglib2.0-0 *overwrites* the
> libglib2.0-0 changelog /on the f
> and I'm fairly sure we didn't introduce
> them at any time during oneiric.
No, we introduced *multiarch* in oneiric, so now the system cares a lot
more about file integrity.
So glib2.0 needs to clean up its historic mis-migration.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: T
Steve Langasek [2011-09-30 1:39 -]:
> This is a classic botched symlink->directory migration in a package.
For sure, but neither the natty nor the recent oneiric versions
actually shipped any symlinks, and I'm fairly sure we didn't introduce
them at any time during oneiric.
--
You received
Please show 'ls -ld /usr/share/doc/libglib2.0*'. I'm pretty sure one of
the directories is wrongly symlinked to the other, which means that
unpacking libglib2.0-data after libglib2.0-0 *overwrites* the
libglib2.0-0 changelog /on the filesystem/.
This is a classic botched symlink->directory migrat
** Tags added: rls-mgr-o-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
Status in “glib2.0” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Status in
Thanks. This is certainly the inexplicable part:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2011-09-20 10:02
/usr/share/doc/libglib2.0-bin/changelog.Debian.gz ->
../libglib2.0-0/changelog.Debian.gz
but then again that's just -bin, not the actual package which caused
trouble. The other dpkg -S /ls -l output looks
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bug
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> In such a situation, could you please give me the output of
>
> ls -l /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
> dpkg -S /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root
I tried to reproduce this by booting a natty live system, manually
enabling multiarch (/etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/multiarch), and upgrading to
oneiric's libc6, libglib2.0-*, and then installing libglib2.0-0:i386.
These steps all worked fine, and changelog.Debian.gz for all glib2.0
binaries were intact af
I downloaded the i386 and amd64 binaries from that version from
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.29.92-0ubuntu1/+build/2793297
and
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.29.92-0ubuntu1/+build/2793299.
They both have an identical changelog.Debian.gz, so I'm not sure where
the c
Note that I can not reproduce this in a chroot when installing
libglib2.0-0 and 2.0-data oneiric nor when upgrading such a chroot from
natty.
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed i
18 matches
Mail list logo