I vote that this bug be closed based on #32, dnsmasq is fully
controllable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Please make NetworkManager-controlled
I found a solution on stackoverflow thanks to @kbenoit there.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/117899/configure-networkmanagers-
dnsmasq-to-use-etc-hosts
This is not really a bug at all. You just have to configure stuff under
/etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d instead, e.g.,
# echo "addn-hosts=/e
+1 Also affects me. Took me quite some time to find this bug report.
Very unusual behavior.
Using a hosts.conf in /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d with the content is not
able to simulate multiple IP addresses for one FQDN:
address=/admin.app/127.0.0.1
>From the manpage:
-A, --address=//[domain/][
+1 Affects me. Tooks me some time to dig and find out the solution. It's
really bad user experience.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Please make N
At the very least there could be a "dnsmasq_options" entry in
NetworkManager.conf that could override the default options that
NetworkManager calls dnsmasq with.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
h
Pointlessly aggravating to break something that long term linux users
have relied on for years. At a minimum, a comment in the default
/etc/hosts would be useful.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
Much better solution would be adding wildcards support directly to /etc/hosts.
Or at least to systemd-resolved.
There is even RFE for the latter: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/766
Having dns server running just to add wildcards is really an overkill.
Systemd-resolved is much better su
I should have written more in my previous message.
Having a local lightweight DNS server configured by default, even if it does
not respect `/etc/hosts`, may be seen as an opportunity.
Don't force it to use `/etc/hosts`. Just configure it by adding to
`/etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq.d`.
This means w
Here is different way:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/31735832/359072
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Please make NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq re
There is a hack-ish workaround, yet it reminds me of the good ol' days of Linux
when you could actually control things from simple text files:
See Method 1 at https://gist.github.com/magnetikonline/6236150
Between NetworkManager, resolvconf, Bonjour, mDNS, dnsmasq (and I think
even dbus)... t
WTF? How come this is still an issue for over so many years? I can
actually see that dnsmasq is getting started with the parameters to
ignore the hosts file. This should be fixed, so people can set-up their
networking again!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Deskto
+1 affects me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Please make NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq respect /etc/hosts
Status in network-manager package
Affects me. Ubuntu 14.04. dig -x 192.168.1.101 takes a long time to
not come up with an answer. And that's because it's defined in
/etc/hosts.
lsof -i and tcpdump are two programs that can do do reverse-DNS lookups,
and ignoring /etc/hosts means they take way longer than they normally
would.
H
@d1663m, Perhaps Firefox keeps some cache.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Please make NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq respect /etc/hosts
Statu
Ubuntu 14.04 - Firefox browser refuses to obey /etc/hosts
I have an entry in /etc/hosts pointing to a public internet IP which
doesn't already have a DNS hostname associated.
Following advice from this post: http://askubuntu.com/questions/117899
/configure-dnsmasq-to-use-etc-hosts-file
I added/e
OK, I managed to send a dbus signal to set specific dns for a specific domain
but this signal went to the initial dnsmasq started when system booted up.
So the dnsmasq started by the wifi sharing connection has no dbus interface and
it doesn't read the /etc/hosts. It has totally static hardcoded
I'm on Ubuntu 14.04. This is affecting me. I'm sharing my wifi connection. The
problem is that there's a server that has to be queried from a DNS outside of
my normal one, but since dnsmasq is using default DNS servers set by dhcp, the
devices behind this shared wifi connection can't connect to
Has this now been resolved?
Because it appears to be working without any of the hack mentioned in
askubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Plea
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Please make NetworkManager-controlled
I just did a fresh install on 2 laptops that were working fine with
version 12.04. Both laptops have this issue with version 12.10. I've
tried commenting out dns=dnsmasq in
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf and creating a wrapper script
for dnsmasq that removes the --no-hosts option. Neith
It's great that /etc/hosts is still consulted by ordinary lookups
originating from the Ubuntu system, but the hardcoded removal of
/etc/hosts use from dnsmasq config causes other problems, for example if
you want this system to provide DNS services for other machines, for
example even VMs running i
Well, my system is a fresh install were I just preserved my home
directory and the 1.2.3.4 foo doesn't works.
The nsswitch.conf does have the 'files' on the hosts: entry. So, I must
assume that either:
1) My system install was broken someway OR
2) There is some config file on user's home which ca
I removed my comment, because I found out that there was a mistake in my
Kerberos config. I couldn't figure it out because the ping
doesn't work in my case because the companies firewall doesn't allow
it. Its better to use something like traceroute in this case. But
sometimes one cannot see thin
jerico wrote:
> I've got no instance of dnsmasq running and entries
> in /etc/hosts are respected when e.g. letting Firefox
> (or any other application I've access to) resolve URLs.
Yes, that is because the libc resolver consults /etc/hosts without doing
a DNS lookup.
> AFAIK /etc/hosts is in not
Argh, I wrote "But prior to Ubuntu 12.04, NM didn't start a local
nameserver at all; no DNS lookups were done externally and /etc/hosts
wasn't respected then either." There's a typo in there. I meant to
say:
But prior to Ubuntu 12.04, NM didn't start a local nameserver at
all; DNS lookups we
The previous poster wrote: "But prior to Ubuntu 12.04, NM didn't start a
local nameserver at all; no DNS lookups were done externally and
/etc/hosts wasn't respected then either."
IMO this is not true. I've got no instance of dnsmasq running and
entries in /etc/hosts are respected when e.g. lettin
Contributors have claimed here (bug #993298) above that /etc/hosts is no
longer respected, but that is not the case. As always, with
hosts: files [...]
in /etc/nsswitch.conf, the libc resolver consults /etc/hosts first.
Yes, NM runs dnsmasq with the no-hosts option. Consequently a
@Christian: Can you explain how everything was configured when it
worked? Were you using dnsmasq locally?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993298
Title:
Please
** Summary changed:
- NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq does not respect /etc/hosts
+ Please make NetworkManager-controlled dnsmasq respect /etc/hosts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bug
29 matches
Mail list logo
