RE: [Desktop_architects] Tools to help enforce ABI stability

2006-03-15 Thread Banginwar, Rajesh
LSB relies on its test suite in addition to just checking the exported symbols. Again this is as good as the test suite is and hence not full proof. Dwarfdump approach might be helpful but again it is not full proof and another issue is who will use it? Can we just rely on each package developer

Re: [Desktop_architects] Summits at Desktop Developers Conference in Ottawa

2006-03-15 Thread Jim Gettys
IPSEC is not end to end, and does not provide user authentication. By which I mean, an IPSEC tunnel may terminate partway, for example at a firewall, and the traffic continue unencrypted over the organization's network, where a password sniffer gets you (if you don't think corporate networks are c

[Desktop_architects] Tools to help enforce ABI stability

2006-03-15 Thread Dan Kegel
What tools exist out there to enforce ABI stability? Gnome, KDE, and LSB all seem to have tools that compare a shared library to a list of expected exports. That's great for disciplined projects. It might also be handy to have a tool that can be used universally, i.e. without a priori knowledge of