On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 16:22 +0100, Martin Konold wrote:
> Keith: I can assume that in the case of congestion it is not really
> desireable
> to inform all clients about every small mouse movement. I can imagine that it
> is useful to introduce a more relaxed semantic when congestion(*) happens.
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 22:38 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Now it's not idle any more. The "select()" will have exited, but X now has
> an agenda: it needs to inform all the clients that the mouse has moved.
> That basically ends up looping over the internal X client list, and for
> each cli
