On Feb 14, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Matthias Hopf wrote:
...
I think something related to the X protocol (e.g. *no* DBUS) is much
more convenient, because one wants to disable the screen saver on a
particular display. Authorization and identification comes for free
when
done using the X protocol.
What is wrong with (going back to?) the screen saver protocol that has
been part of X11 for just about forever?
See "man XSetScreenSaver"...
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com
Internet Printing and Document Software http://www.easysw.com
_______________________________________________
Desktop_architects mailing list
Desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
