Re: [Desktop_architects] Printing dialog and GNOME

2007-02-22 Thread Murray Cumming
're an expert in one thing, > it > means that you should know *Gnome* intimately. [snip] Telling you about the existence of this feature was meant to be helpful, not to demand that you should know it already. Really, we are not like that. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murra

Re: [Desktop_architects] Printing dialog and GNOME

2007-02-22 Thread Murray Cumming
re finite. So I'm sure that people are grateful for your patches. Sorry if you find the selective snipping annoying. I'm not trying to reply to every point. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ Desktop_

Re: [Desktop_architects] Printing dialog and GNOME

2007-02-22 Thread Murray Cumming
further proved with evidence either good or bad. Feel free to now continue arguing about whether the use of metacity was good/bad/appropriate/evil. Personally I think your extreme opinion in that discussion doesn't reflect the very slight differences in priorities of the various develop

Re: [Desktop_architects] Printing dialog and GNOME

2005-12-15 Thread Murray Cumming
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 16:36 +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Murray Cumming wrote: > > The gnome-print list might be a better place to discuss this: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-print-list/ > > > > Thanks for the link, I will have a look there. > > &g