On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:02 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> with the merge in February, will development on the next iteration be open or
> closed? e.g. is this going to be a code dump or something more useful in the
> long term?
Total merge, long term useful. One tree to rule them all, etc.
Na
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 03:31 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/165205/
Hey,
We have been sponsoring Xgl development here at Novell. David Reveman
has been devoting a large portion of his time to Xgl for the last
fifteen months or so. As far as I know, we are the only company (ie
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 15:52 -0800, Dave Rosenberg wrote:
> In order for Linux desktops to be adopted in enterprises we need one
> set of software that provides all of the above in a bundled fashion.
I would like to see the survey data that bears this out. This sounds
like personal opinion to m
