On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 11:01 -0800, David Schlesinger wrote:
> On 2/22/07 9:47 AM, "Dave Neary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Then again, that reminds me of a line that Lefty Schlessinger told me:
> > "Free Software: 80% as good as the last guy needed it to be."
>
> I'm hoping to have t-shirt
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 01:40 +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
> example. Again I would count Inkscape and Jokosher (maybe also
> Firefox?). I really think we need more of this attitude to really make
> a difference.
Jokosher is an interesting choice. What precisely do you think counts as
"leading by e
"Everyone at the meeting was also concerned about the remarkably murky
area of Linux audio support. As one anonymous developer put it, "Audio
on Linux sucks.""
anonymous? put me on record! :)
___
Desktop_architects mailing list
Desktop_architects@lists
/. has news about OSDL layoffs. Does this have any impact on DAM-3 ?
--p
___
Desktop_architects mailing list
Desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 10:49 +0200, Tim Beaulen wrote:
> InstallShield for Linux exists.
> And if people can make money out of it on Windows and Mac, then they
> can on Linux too.
installshield makes money because of the dozens/hundreds/thousands of
applications developed by ISV's for windows and
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 20:06 +0200, Tim Beaulen wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Segedunum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I mean, even if Adobe do create a
> > Linux desktop port, how does Adobe package it up and how on Earth is anyone
> > going to install it? Anybody think of things like that?
>
> Why can so
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 07:54 -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> We're trying to do a simultaneous release of a product for the Mac
> and for Linux. For the Mac it's pretty easy; we have a variety
> of Macs for testing just to be safe, but the truth is, once it
> works reliably on one Mac, we're pretty ce
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 07:53 +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> Combine this with the increasing BSOD-type behaviour of the kernel after
> 2.2 (much of which may be related to the pursuit of "desktop performance"
> which, of course, includes BSOD emulation), and still after 15 or so years,
> not having
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 17:14 -0500, Leon Shiman wrote:
> we did this openly in x.org in 1999/2000. those documents might be a good
> place for a sublist to start.
what documents? i don't see anything on the MAS site. and i've never
seen anything from x.org about this. URL ?
--p
___
