The MiniAccumuloRunner class that's wired up to o.o.a.start.Main.
I was specifically wondering if anyone else is experiencing issues running
'accumulo minicluster' as both the proxy with useMini=true and the
minicluster command seem broken for me. I'm building from remote HEAD in
master.
On Oct 6,
This is awesome; thanks Eric!
Should we set perCoreThreadCount for failsafe so people can take advantage
of the parallel speedup without having to remember to set accumulo.it.forkCount
manually? If we set it to something relatively small, it shouldn't break
things on slow VMs, but would still ben
If a couple people try it and it works for them, then sure!
Does it work for you?
-Eric
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
> This is awesome; thanks Eric!
>
> Should we set perCoreThreadCount for failsafe so people can take advantage
> of the parallel speedup without having
It actually doesn't seem to work for me. It doesn't break anything, but it
appears that nothing changes. I'm a little concerned that I'm doing
something wrong, since neither switch seems to have any effect. I'm still
getting one VM per test, and it's still running accumulo.it.forkCount
simultane
I still can't get the full suite to run in one go. I think we'll have
to have them turned off in the release profile (not a big deal, if
we've done sufficient testing in advance).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Eric Newton wrote:
> I've s
Looking at some of the latest commits from Corey, as well as some of
the longer messages that seem to wrap when doing "git log --oneline"
I wanted to make a few suggestions:
1) Please include the ticket number at the beginning of the log
message, and in the first line, as it's easier to parse qui
I also had some thoughts that it would probably be bad to squash
commits and retain their messages. If the commits aren't usable
independently, then their messages probably aren't useful
independently either. If both messages are useful, then it's probably
true that both commits were useful as well
Weirdly, gcLotsOfCandidatesIT fails for me every time with an out of heap
exception when I run it single threaded, but with accumulo.it.forkCount=4,
it tends to pass.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Christopher wrote:
> I still can't get the full suite to run in one go. I think we'll have
> to
I know it has been a while, but the command I should run to perform a
compaction on a given table would just be the following if I wanted the
whole table to compact?
compact -t
-
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Table-entry-count-confusion-t
You got it!
On 10/07/2013 05:39 PM, Mastergeek wrote:
I know it has been a while, but the command I should run to perform a
compaction on a given table would just be the following if I wanted the
whole table to compact?
compact -t
-
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-acc
Yes, each rowid has numerous column qualifiers per column family, but I
assumed that the all of that was still wrapped in a single row.
-
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Table-entry-count-confusion-tp5629p5662.html
Sent from the Developers ma
In your original email, you appeared to be using the concept of rows / row
ids and the concept of entries / key-value pairs interchangeably. A row is
a set of key-value pairs (aka entries) with the same row id. You said you
counted the unique row ids, and that the number of entries reported by th
I just tried running "accumulo miniscluster" and saw the same thing. But
in Main.err, not Master.err are you sure you saw this in Master.err?
Has this ever worked? By default the accumulo scripts construct a very
minimal classpath w/ accumulo-start.jar, log4j-1.2.15.jar, and the conf
dir. If
Keith,
You are right- I mistyped. I meant Main.err not Master.err. I just verified
this feature worked during the time of this
commit: 6965a8aaa2f53ec796a3487c1639affe0dfc6bfa.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> I just tried running "accumulo miniscluster" and saw the same
14 matches
Mail list logo