Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC2

2014-04-17 Thread Josh Elser
Just ingested 500M entries with CI and verified them successfully too. On 4/17/14, 6:59 PM, Josh Elser wrote: +1 * Built and tested (unit and integration) src tarball against Apache Hadoop 2.2.0, 2.3.0 and 2.4.0. * Verified src and bin tarballs hash/sigs * Verified performance fix in place afte

Re: [DISCUSS] More Versioning Discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Mike Drob
For a little bit of historical context - when filing ACCUMULO-751 to ask for wire compatibility, I had no intention of providing both forward and backwards compatibility. I really wanted the ability to do rolling upgrades where I could upgrade tablet servers one-by-one and not have suffer any clust

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC2

2014-04-17 Thread Josh Elser
+1 * Built and tested (unit and integration) src tarball against Apache Hadoop 2.2.0, 2.3.0 and 2.4.0. * Verified src and bin tarballs hash/sigs * Verified performance fix in place after RC1 (ACCUMULO-2668) * Ran Pig jobs * Checked over user manual On 4/15/14, 9:57 PM, Christopher wrote: Accu

[DISCUSS] More Versioning Discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Christopher
Sean comment on ACCUMULO-2343: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2343?focusedCommentId=13973504&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13973504 I was going to comment in IRC or in response in JIRA, but I think this would better serve the group to

Re: Release testing for 1.6.0

2014-04-17 Thread Keith Turner
Not on the release reqs, but something I did I ran 24 hr of Random walk (w/o agitation) using Conditional.xml for walkers. All walkers ran the entire time w/o hanging or erring. 20 EC2 nodes (17 walkers, DNs, tservers) Hadoop 2.2.0 Zookeeper 3.4.5 Accumulo 1.6.0 RC2 On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:

Re: Review Request 20465: ACCUMULO-2343 - AsyncSocketAppender

2014-04-17 Thread Sean Busbey
> On April 17, 2014, 9:21 p.m., Vikram Srivastava wrote: > > We should also test that using the new Appender works fine and daemons are > > able to send logs to Monitor. Should we add a MacIT for that? > > > > Also, should we update the example log configuration files to use the new > > Append

Review Request 20467: ACCUMULO-2654 updates for 1.6 branch

2014-04-17 Thread Sean Busbey
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20467/ --- Review request for accumulo and kturner. Bugs: ACCUMULO-2654 https://issues

Re: Review Request 20465: ACCUMULO-2343 - AsyncSocketAppender

2014-04-17 Thread Josh Elser
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20465/#review40698 --- Are you planning to wire this up in pieces? It would be nice to be a

Re: Review Request 20465: ACCUMULO-2343 - AsyncSocketAppender

2014-04-17 Thread Vikram Srivastava
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20465/#review40697 --- We should also test that using the new Appender works fine and daemo

Review Request 20465: ACCUMULO-2343 - AsyncSocketAppender

2014-04-17 Thread Bill Havanki
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20465/ --- Review request for accumulo and Josh Elser. Bugs: ACCUMULO-2343 https://iss

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC2

2014-04-17 Thread Eric Newton
+1 Ran 24-hour randomwalk test without agitation. Results documented in ACCUMULO-2655. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Christopher wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0. > > Git Commit: e7863ea0dd523f0c6d3552e6844ff7411d78d557 > Branch:

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo Blog

2014-04-17 Thread dlmarion
This vote passes with eight +1 votes (5 binding, 3 non-binding) and one +0 vote. Bill H - I think you volunteered to help with the setup. The instructions are located at http://www.apache.org/dev/project-blogs . If you are unable to do this let me know. Thanks, Dave - Original Messa