Just ingested 500M entries with CI and verified them successfully too.
On 4/17/14, 6:59 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
+1
* Built and tested (unit and integration) src tarball against Apache
Hadoop 2.2.0, 2.3.0 and 2.4.0.
* Verified src and bin tarballs hash/sigs
* Verified performance fix in place afte
For a little bit of historical context - when filing ACCUMULO-751 to ask
for wire compatibility, I had no intention of providing both forward and
backwards compatibility. I really wanted the ability to do rolling upgrades
where I could upgrade tablet servers one-by-one and not have suffer any
clust
+1
* Built and tested (unit and integration) src tarball against Apache
Hadoop 2.2.0, 2.3.0 and 2.4.0.
* Verified src and bin tarballs hash/sigs
* Verified performance fix in place after RC1 (ACCUMULO-2668)
* Ran Pig jobs
* Checked over user manual
On 4/15/14, 9:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
Accu
Sean comment on ACCUMULO-2343:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2343?focusedCommentId=13973504&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13973504
I was going to comment in IRC or in response in JIRA, but I think this
would better serve the group to
Not on the release reqs, but something I did
I ran 24 hr of Random walk (w/o agitation) using Conditional.xml for
walkers. All walkers ran the entire time w/o hanging or erring.
20 EC2 nodes (17 walkers, DNs, tservers)
Hadoop 2.2.0
Zookeeper 3.4.5
Accumulo 1.6.0 RC2
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:
> On April 17, 2014, 9:21 p.m., Vikram Srivastava wrote:
> > We should also test that using the new Appender works fine and daemons are
> > able to send logs to Monitor. Should we add a MacIT for that?
> >
> > Also, should we update the example log configuration files to use the new
> > Append
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20467/
---
Review request for accumulo and kturner.
Bugs: ACCUMULO-2654
https://issues
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20465/#review40698
---
Are you planning to wire this up in pieces? It would be nice to be a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20465/#review40697
---
We should also test that using the new Appender works fine and daemo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20465/
---
Review request for accumulo and Josh Elser.
Bugs: ACCUMULO-2343
https://iss
+1
Ran 24-hour randomwalk test without agitation.
Results documented in ACCUMULO-2655.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>
> Git Commit: e7863ea0dd523f0c6d3552e6844ff7411d78d557
> Branch:
This vote passes with eight +1 votes (5 binding, 3 non-binding) and one +0
vote.
Bill H - I think you volunteered to help with the setup. The instructions are
located at http://www.apache.org/dev/project-blogs . If you are unable to do
this let me know.
Thanks,
Dave
- Original Messa
12 matches
Mail list logo