Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old

2014-04-19 Thread Corey Nolet
I agree. Are those tickets really getting in the way? Maybe they could be labeled differently to separate them from tech debt, bugs, and other active features? On Apr 19, 2014 3:51 PM, "John Vines" wrote: > Won't fix isn't accurate though. We're not saying we will reject work on > them, they're j

Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old

2014-04-19 Thread John Vines
Won't fix isn't accurate though. We're not saying we will reject work on them, they're just not a high priority. On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Christopher wrote: > Resolving them as "Won't Fix" seems valid to me, if the fact that a > ticket is open helps us track/manage outstanding work. (Th

Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old

2014-04-19 Thread Christopher
Resolving them as "Won't Fix" seems valid to me, if the fact that a ticket is open helps us track/manage outstanding work. (The obvious question, then, is "does it help in some way?"). They can always be re-opened if we decide it's worth doing. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsi

Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old

2014-04-19 Thread John Vines
Just because they're old doesn't make them invalid. They're just at a lower priority. Closing them for the sake of closing them seems like a bad idea. But if they're actually invalid now, that's an entirely different notion. Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. On Apr 19, 2014

Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old

2014-04-19 Thread David Medinets
ACCUMULO-483 , for example, involves creating a purge locality utility. However, there have been no comments since Oct 2012. If the feature has not risen in priority since then, how will it become more important in the future. Perhaps a 'good idea

Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old

2014-04-19 Thread Corey Nolet
Some of these tickets still look like very valid feature/integration requests that would still be reasonable to have. See ACCUMULO-74, ACCUMULO-143, ACCUMULO-136, ACCUMULO-211, ACCUMULO-483, ACCUMULO-490, ACCUMULO-508 On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > Deleting tickets is a

Re: 551 JIRA Tickets Over 2 Years Old

2014-04-19 Thread Mike Drob
Deleting tickets is a no-no, but flagging them is certainly fine. On Apr 19, 2014 12:03 AM, "David Medinets" wrote: > Opps. Sorry, I did my filtering badly. There are 68 tickets over 2 years > old. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-18?jql=project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20status