---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21404/
---
Review request for accumulo.
Bugs: ACCUMULO-2804
https://issues.apache.org/
> On May 14, 2014, 1:07 a.m., Christopher Tubbs wrote:
> > dependencyManagement sections only inherit from a parent pom during our
> > build. This change will not prevent these transitive dependencies from
> > being inherited by projects which depend on Accumulo. To achieve that, the
> > exclu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21413/#review42924
---
dependencyManagement sections only inherit from a parent pom during
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21404/#review42925
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me. I think it was only used in the maven-pl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21169/
---
(Updated May 13, 2014, 5:43 p.m.)
Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21404/#review42916
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ryan Fishel
On May 13, 2014, 8:52 p.m., Sean
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21413/#review42917
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ryan Fishel
On May 13, 2014, 10:39 p.m., Sea
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21413/
---
Review request for accumulo.
Bugs: ACCUMULO-2805
https://issues.apache.org/
We made a dev decision to defer to downstream maintainers for platform
binaries (DEBs, RPMs) during the 1.6.0 development. So, the Accumulo
team is not officially providing these, but we'd love to support
downstream maintainers who are, as best we can.
You may be interested in the forthcoming BIGT
FWIW the Bigtop packaging does include Debian packaging. Download the
Bigtop source, apply the latest BIGTOP-1175 patch, and type "make
accumulo-deb". There's a bunch of dependencies but many of them are listed
on the home page (http://bigtop.apache.org/) or will be obvious when you
run into them.
Any version newer than the version which exported it should be able to
import it. A file created by a newer version is not expected to work
in an older version, though.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:13 AM, David Medinets
wrote:
> When a v1.5.x
Hi, are there deb packages for 1.6.0
http://archive.apache.org/dist/accumulo/1.6.0/ like there were for 1.5.0?
I started trying to cut over away from them so I can upgrade my servers.
Thanks!
/***
Joe Stein
Founder, Principal Consultant
Big Data Open Sou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21169/
---
(Updated May 13, 2014, 5:52 p.m.)
Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21169/
---
(Updated May 13, 2014, 5:05 p.m.)
Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey and
Everyone gather at http://beeroverip.org so we can lift a glass saluting
the Accumulo dev team.
Does anyone know if we have some build/packaging documentation that lists
where we currently expect to get our various runtime dependencies from? And
when we decide to repackage something that we know is present in the
environment?
I know the assembly file lists which dependencies we package in ou
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> We should not require an explicit discussion period prior to a majority
> vote, especially in our bylaws. Discussion and conflict resolution should
> happen as a part of our normal community interactions. If these things are
> not already happe
Originally, when I first started work on the ticket, using logback would have
been my goal. After going through the code a few times, what is driving me now
is really to clean things up a little and position things for an eventual
ability to use logback or to upgrade to log4j-2.
After seeing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21169/#review42825
---
docs/src/main/latex/accumulo_user_manual/chapters/troubleshooting.t
When a v1.5.x table is exported, what versions of Accumulo will import it?
A similar question can be asked about v1.6.x.
+1 Whatever helps you organize the work logically. Thanks for
volunteering to improve our logging!
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ed Coleman wrote:
> I am willing to take another run at the Consistent Logging ticket,
> ACCUMULO-1242, but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21378/#review42823
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Havanki
On May 13, 2014, 9:50 a.m., Sea
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21378/
---
Review request for accumulo and Bill Havanki.
Bugs: ACCUMULO-2798
https://i
Originally, when I first started work on the ticket, using logback would have
been my goal. After going through the code a few times, what is driving me now
is really to clean things up a little and position things for an eventual
ability to use logback or to upgrade to log4j-2.
After seeing
Sounds good, Ed.
Just out of curiosity, are you planning on doing this with the goal of
being able to swap out log4j for logback? In personal projects, I like
slf4j solely for the message formatting feature.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> +1 LGTM
>
> Overall approach lo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21169/
---
(Updated May 12, 2014, 7:29 p.m.)
Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey and
26 matches
Mail list logo
