I don't see it as adding much value, personally... especially if
releasing/building is well-documented.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Corey Nolet wrote:
>
> I'm working on updating the "Making a Release" page on our website [1] with
> mo
I'm working on updating the "Making a Release" page on our website [1] with
more detailed instructions on the steps involved. "Create the candidate"
section references the build.sh script and I'm contemplating just removing
it altogether since it seems like, after quick discussions with a few
indiv
Because we've agreed on Semver for release versioning, all the JIRAs marked
for 1.6.x as something other than "Bug" (or maybe "Task", and "Test")
should probably have 1.6.x dropped from their fixVersion.
They can/should get addressed in 1.7 and later. Those currently marked for
1.6.x need to be tr
Since we've been discussing cutting an rc0 for testing before we begin the
formal release process. I've moved over all the non-blocker tickets from
1.6.2 to 1.6.3 [1]. Many of the tickets that moved haven't been updated
since the 1.6.1 release. If there are tickets you feel are necessary for
1.6.2,
I'll cut one tonight
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
> I think we could probably put together a non-voting RC0 to start testing
> with.
>
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Eric Newton
> wrote:
> >
> > We are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29176/
---
Review request for accumulo.
Bugs: ACCUMULO-3420
https://issues.apache.org/
I think we could probably put together a non-voting RC0 to start testing
with.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Eric Newton wrote:
>
> We are running 1.6.1 w/patches in production already. I would much rather
> have a 1.6.2 official relea
There is an addauths command in 1.6 and newer. What version are you using?
On Dec 17, 2014 7:32 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
> Yes, presently that is how setauths works and there is no way to append
> new authorizations to an existing set.
>
> I'll open a ticket about introducing a '-a' option to appe
There is no notion of connecting to a namespace. To "interact" with a
namespace, just include the namespace in the table name you provide.
For example, to create a table 't' in a namespace 'n', use the table
name 'n.t'.
panqing...@163.com wrote:
HI
I created a namespace, but how should
Yes, presently that is how setauths works and there is no way to append
new authorizations to an existing set.
I'll open a ticket about introducing a '-a' option to append new
authorizations, but that will be subject to race conditions which might
be of concern.
panqing...@163.com wrote:
> HI, I'
See the methods on connector.securityOperations()
panqing...@163.com wrote:
HI,
java apihas the grant,setauths class?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/java-api-grant-setauths-tp12609.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at
HI, I'm try use setauths -s command,only save the new permissions?
panqing...@163.com
HI
I created a namespace, but how should use? How to switch the current
namespace? Java clientt how to connect to the specified namespace?
panqing...@163.com
HI,
java apihas the grant,setauths class?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/java-api-grant-setauths-tp12609.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 matches
Mail list logo