Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30817/#review72159 --- docs/src/main/asciidoc/chapters/kerberos.txt

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30817/#review72162 --- docs/src/main/asciidoc/chapters/kerberos.txt

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

> On Feb. 12, 2015, 2:58 p.m., kturner wrote: > > docs/src/main/asciidoc/chapters/kerberos.txt, line 338 > > > > > > This approach requires a user to modify the code for their map reduce > > job. It would be nice to

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

> On Feb. 12, 2015, 3:07 p.m., kturner wrote: > > docs/src/main/asciidoc/chapters/kerberos.txt, line 327 > > > > > > What happens if user passes KerberosToken to `setConnectorInfo()`? Nothing bad -- the Mappers/Red

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

> On Feb. 12, 2015, 2:58 p.m., kturner wrote: > > docs/src/main/asciidoc/chapters/kerberos.txt, line 338 > > > > > > This approach requires a user to modify the code for their map reduce > > job. It would be nice to

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

> On Feb. 12, 2015, 2:58 p.m., kturner wrote: > > docs/src/main/asciidoc/chapters/kerberos.txt, line 338 > > > > > > This approach requires a user to modify the code for their map reduce > > job. It would be nice to

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

> On Feb. 12, 2015, 3:07 p.m., kturner wrote: > > core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/admin/SecurityOperations.java, > > line 360 > > > > > > Do you think this method would ever need options? Or does i

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

> On Feb. 12, 2015, 3:07 p.m., kturner wrote: > > core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/admin/SecurityOperations.java, > > line 360 > > > > > > Do you think this method would ever need options? Or does i

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30817/ --- (Updated Feb. 12, 2015, 7:13 p.m.) Review request for accumulo and Christopher

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30817/#review72223 --- core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/admin/Delegation

Re: Review Request 30817: ACCUMULO-3513 Delegation token support

> On Feb. 12, 2015, 7:42 p.m., kturner wrote: > > core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/admin/DelegationTokenConfig.java, > > line 67 > > > > > > Would it be possible to move this out of public API? Ah, y

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC5

+1 * Verified all changes over RC4 are present * Hashes/sigs good * ran from bin tarball * built/tested from src tarball * Verified NOTICE in native.tar.gz Corey Nolet wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 Branch: 1.6.2-rc5 SHA1: 4294

Hadoop Summit 2015 Talk

FYI -- Billie and I have submitted a talk to Hadoop Summit 2015 in San Jose, CA in June. http://hadoopsummit.uservoice.com/forums/283260-committer-track/suggestions/7073993-a-year-in-the-life-of-apache-accumulo I'd be overjoyed if anyone would vote for the talk if they'd like to see it happen.