Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC5

2015-02-18 Thread Corey Nolet
Thanks Keith!. Josh deserves credit for the release notes. We'll publish the site and I'll get the announcement together. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote: +1 ditto. Mirrors appear updated as well. I just fixed another s/1.6.1/1.6.2/ on the sidebar. I

Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 Released

2015-02-18 Thread Corey Nolet
Forwarding to dev. -- Forwarded message -- From: Corey Nolet cjno...@apache.org Date: Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:25 PM Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 Released To: u...@accumulo.apache.org, annou...@apache.org The Apache Accumulo project is happy to announce its 1.6.2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC5

2015-02-18 Thread Keith Turner
Corey thanks for doing this release. I took a look at the release notes on staging, looks good. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Corey Nolet cjno...@apache.org wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 Branch: 1.6.2-rc5 SHA1:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC5

2015-02-18 Thread Josh Elser
+1 ditto. Mirrors appear updated as well. I just fixed another s/1.6.1/1.6.2/ on the sidebar. I think we're all good. Keith Turner wrote: Corey thanks for doing this release. I took a look at the release notes on staging, looks good. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Corey

Re: Values go to a wrong table during recovery.

2015-02-18 Thread Christopher
Hi Denis, This doesn't sound like a known bug to me. Your hypothesis is reasonable, since WALs use a surrogate ID, which maps to table ID/tablet information, when read back. It is possible that it incorrectly interprets this mapping and replays data into the wrong table. Given the amount of

Re: Values go to a wrong table during recovery.

2015-02-18 Thread Christopher
Sorry, that link should be: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote: Hi Denis, This doesn't sound like a known bug to me. Your hypothesis is reasonable,