Not unique to 1.6.2, not all of the tests pass 100% of the time.
Mike Drob wrote:
Hooray for more testing!
Also, why did we have failures on 1.6.2?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:43 AM, David Medinets
wrote:
+1. Y'all are continuing to create fine software.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Josh
+1. Y'all are continuing to create fine software.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Corey and I were chatting earlier this week and we wondered about how the
> number of tests has grown over the 1.6 branch.
>
> I kicked off test runs over 1.6.0, 1.6.1, and 1.6.2 to see how the
Hooray for more testing!
Also, why did we have failures on 1.6.2?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:43 AM, David Medinets
wrote:
> +1. Y'all are continuing to create fine software.
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> > Corey and I were chatting earlier this week and we wondered a
