Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
> I'll have to wait tomorrow but if you want to do it you are welcome :).
Superb. I'm running the tests now, and will hopefully commit tonight.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user phrocker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134#discussion_r77917975
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/MultiThreadedRFileTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,387 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user melrief commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
I'll have to wait tomorrow but if you want to do it you are welcome :).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
> Good, done and also change since to 2.0.
This looks good. One last thing is the `assertSame()` call. Want to fix
that too? I am also ok fixing on that local commit.
---
If your projec
Github user melrief commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
I also changed this so that it will be merged in `master` and not in `1.8`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user melrief commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
Good, done and also change since to 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user melrief commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145#discussion_r77915765
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/KeyBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user melrief commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145#discussion_r77915578
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/KeyBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user melrief commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145#discussion_r77915565
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/KeyBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
Fine by me. I just had the two comments (javadoc cleanup and the
unnecessary string->text->bytes conversion). It's all recorded on JIRA for
posterity.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user melrief commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/145
I did the rebase and started with the changes but I have to force push it
and probably we are going to miss some comments after the push. Are you ok with
force pushing the rebase with the changes r
Okay, I've updated the DOAP to match the SVN dist upload date (svn commit
timestamp), and added the missing entries.
I then manually updated all the entries in JIRA to reflect the same dates,
and did a sync on reporter.apache.org (which is still a day-off... waiting
for feedback on that from ComDev
Christopher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:08 PM Josh Elser wrote:
Christopher wrote:
Okay, so now that 1.8.0 is wrapping up, I'd like to push out a release of
1.6.6, and plan to cease active development on that branch.
+1
This will allow us to focus our development and bugfixes on the la
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/135
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:08 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> Christopher wrote:
> > Okay, so now that 1.8.0 is wrapping up, I'd like to push out a release of
> > 1.6.6, and plan to cease active development on that branch.
>
> +1
>
> > This will allow us to focus our development and bugfixes on the latest
>
Github user keith-turner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/135
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
The Accumulo team is proud to announce the release of Accumulo version 1.8.0
!
Accumulo 1.8.0 is a minor release that includes over 200 bug fixes, 71
improvements and 4 new features. This release is backwards-compatible with
1.7.x.
This version is now available in Maven Central, and at:
https://
I agree with Billie that the technically-correct-ASF-policy-date is
the SVN dist date. Similar to Josh I don't think this is a place where
we need a lot of precision and anything within a week or two is good
enough.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Christopher wrote:
> I noticed that there were a
Okay, SVN dist date is easy enough to check, based on SVN commit
timestamps. I'll converge on those. I'm not so concerned about precision as
I am about consistency, especially to inform the filling in of the gaps.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:49 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> I agree with Billie that the
I prefer SVN dist date, but I know that isn't the easiest to come by ... I
recall approximating the date on a couple of occasions when i couldn't
figure it out readily. Another possibility is to use the archive,
https://archive.apache.org/dist/accumulo/, assuming that a release hits the
archive on
We are almost ready to make the announcement of the 1.8.0 release. If
anyone has a few minutes, please review http://apache.github.io/accumulo/
and especially http://apache.github.io/accumulo/release_notes/1.8.0. I
pushed artifacts to dist.apache.org yesterday and the 5 mirrors I checked
have a c
22 matches
Mail list logo
