Preview 1.6.6-rc0

2016-09-09 Thread Christopher
I just staged a release candidate for testing 1.6.6: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1058/ Branch: 1.6.6-rc0 Commit: ac169c7167a9c0ca94f9c8d587974e8acbe4c382 This isn't a vote... it's just to give time for preview testing before I start the vote. I'll turn thi

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #134: ACCUMULO-4391 Source deepcopies cannot be used s...

2016-09-09 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] accumulo issue #150: ACCUMULO-4424 Start thrift servers immediately on ha co...

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
Github user joshelser commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/150 @ctubbsii @billierinaldi might be interested in this one. I need to write some tests, but I verified that things are working as expected in a local installation. --- If your project is set up f

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #150: ACCUMULO-4424 Start thrift servers immediately o...

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
GitHub user joshelser opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/150 ACCUMULO-4424 Start thrift servers immediately on ha components You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/joshelser/accumulo start-th

Re: [DISCUSS] Release plan 1.6.6

2016-09-09 Thread Christopher
I'm going to try to create a release candidate soon (today), so people can begin testing on an essentially frozen branch. If there are no surprises or changes, I'll start the vote next Monday from those same artifacts. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:41 PM Christopher wrote: > Thanks, Josh! That'll hel

[GitHub] accumulo issue #134: ACCUMULO-4391 Source deepcopies cannot be used safely i...

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
Github user joshelser commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134 > I will leave this issue open until the first 1.6.6 release candidate, to accommodate test additions. If none arrive before the RC, I'll create a new JIRA for adding new tests. Coolio.

[GitHub] accumulo issue #134: ACCUMULO-4391 Source deepcopies cannot be used safely i...

2016-09-09 Thread ctubbsii
Github user ctubbsii commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134 I will leave this issue open until the first 1.6.6 release candidate, to accommodate test additions. If none arrive before the RC, I'll create a new JIRA for adding new tests. --- If your projec

[GitHub] accumulo issue #134: ACCUMULO-4391 Source deepcopies cannot be used safely i...

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
Github user joshelser commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134 > Okay, I'm going to merge this in. Can you make sure we get some related tasks filed for some of the extra testing investigation we talked about previously, please? If Ivan can get to t

[GitHub] accumulo issue #134: ACCUMULO-4391 Source deepcopies cannot be used safely i...

2016-09-09 Thread ctubbsii
Github user ctubbsii commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134 Okay, I'm going to merge this in. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #149: ACCUMULO-2972: fixed description for instance.se...

2016-09-09 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/149 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] accumulo issue #149: ACCUMULO-2972: fixed description for instance.secret

2016-09-09 Thread milleruntime
Github user milleruntime commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/149 Made English better in 0ecc47161cc5b019f856dccd78bec48c4ba70e13 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #149: ACCUMULO-2972: fixed description for instance.se...

2016-09-09 Thread milleruntime
Github user milleruntime commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/149#discussion_r78224771 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java --- @@ -123,8 +123,9 @@ @Sensitive INSTANCE_SECRET("instance.secr

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #149: ACCUMULO-2972: fixed description for instance.se...

2016-09-09 Thread ctubbsii
Github user ctubbsii commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/149#discussion_r78223626 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java --- @@ -123,8 +123,9 @@ @Sensitive INSTANCE_SECRET("instance.secret",

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #149: ACCUMULO-2972: fixed description for instance.se...

2016-09-09 Thread ctubbsii
Github user ctubbsii commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/149#discussion_r78223111 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java --- @@ -123,8 +123,9 @@ @Sensitive INSTANCE_SECRET("instance.secret",

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #149: ACCUMULO-2972: fixed description for instance.se...

2016-09-09 Thread milleruntime
GitHub user milleruntime opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/149 ACCUMULO-2972: fixed description for instance.secret 1.6 documentation fix for ACCUMULO-2972 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.c

Re: [DISCUSS] Release plan 1.6.6

2016-09-09 Thread Christopher
Thanks, Josh! That'll help speed things along. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:52 PM Josh Elser wrote: > In case it gets missed in the traffic: I just diff'ed > rel/1.6.5..origin/1.6 and updated the user-manual with the changes. > Documentation should be good to go for 1.6.6. > > Christopher wrote: >

[GitHub] accumulo issue #148: Corrected chapter numbering in 1.6 manual

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
Github user joshelser commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/148 Thanks @milleruntime. Much appreciated. I had no clue the numbering was even off. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release plan 1.6.6

2016-09-09 Thread Josh Elser
In case it gets missed in the traffic: I just diff'ed rel/1.6.5..origin/1.6 and updated the user-manual with the changes. Documentation should be good to go for 1.6.6. Christopher wrote: Okay, so now that 1.8.0 is wrapping up, I'd like to push out a release of 1.6.6, and plan to cease active d

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #148: Corrected chapter numbering in 1.6 manual

2016-09-09 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/148 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] accumulo issue #134: ACCUMULO-4391 Source deepcopies cannot be used safely i...

2016-09-09 Thread ivakegg
Github user ivakegg commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134 @ya-all I already removed the static blocks that were setting the log4j levels and moved them into the log4j.properties for the tests. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e

[GitHub] accumulo issue #148: Corrected chapter numbering in 1.6 manual

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
Github user joshelser commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/148 :+1: looks fine to me. It appears that the only docs updates we have for 1.6 presently are a slight re-wording (dbb2840d836366193f1b604cd4d278045290f6ed via ACCUMULO-4310). Let me also include th

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #147: ACCUMULO-2844 Removed 'slave' terminology

2016-09-09 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/147 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] accumulo pull request #148: Corrected chapter numbering in 1.6 manual

2016-09-09 Thread milleruntime
GitHub user milleruntime opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/148 Corrected chapter numbering in 1.6 manual Good time to fix chapter numbering You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/milleruntime/

[GitHub] accumulo issue #134: ACCUMULO-4391 Source deepcopies cannot be used safely i...

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
Github user joshelser commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/134 > I agree with @EdColeman that we should avoid the direct use of Log4J in code. Hrm, I mentioned this earlier too. I guess it got lost.. --- If your project is set up for it, you can re

[GitHub] accumulo issue #147: ACCUMULO-2844 Removed 'slave' terminology

2016-09-09 Thread joshelser
Github user joshelser commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/147 Created ACCUMULO-4449 for this "subset" of changes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t