Re: Running Accumulo on a standard file system, without Hadoop

Dylan Hutchison wrote: You can configure HDFS to use the RawLocalFileSystem class forfile:// > URIs which is what is done for a majority of the integration tests. Beware > that you configure the RawLocalFileSystem as the ChecksumFileSystem > (default forfile://) will fail miserably around

Re: Running Accumulo on a standard file system, without Hadoop

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > That's true, but HDFS supports multiple "implementations" based on the > scheme of the URI being used. > > e.g. hdfs:// is mapped to DistributedFileSystem > > You can configure HDFS to use the RawLocalFileSystem class for

Re: Running Accumulo on a standard file system, without Hadoop

That's true, but HDFS supports multiple "implementations" based on the scheme of the URI being used. e.g. hdfs:// is mapped to DistributedFileSystem You can configure HDFS to use the RawLocalFileSystem class for file:// URIs which is what is done for a majority of the integration tests.

RE: Running Accumulo on a standard file system, without Hadoop

IIRC, Accumulo *only* uses the HDFS client, so it needs something on the other side that can respond to that protocol. MiniAccumulo starts up MiniHDFS for this. You could run some other type of service locally that is HDFS client compatible (something like Quantcast QFS[1], setting up client

Running Accumulo on a standard file system, without Hadoop

Hi folks, A friend of mine asked about running Accumulo on a normal file system in place of Hadoop, similar to the way MiniAccumulo runs. How possible is this, or how much work would it take to do so? I think my friend is just interested in running on a single node, but I am curious about both