[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.3-rc1

2019-03-29 Thread Christopher
This vote was superseded by the vote for RC2. On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:45 AM Keith Turner wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:09 AM Christopher wrote: > > > > I'll also -1 for this. I'll put together an RC2 with the fix. > > Thanks Christopher. I successfully ran mvn verify with the #1057 pa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.3-rc2

2019-03-29 Thread Christopher
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:42 PM Keith Turner wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:57 PM Christopher wrote: > > > > -1 due to https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1064 > > Do you know if this is a new bug since 1.9.2? Or does the same > problem exist in 1.9.2, 1.9.1, etc? > The underlying i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.3-rc2

2019-03-29 Thread Keith Turner
-1 I ran into the following issue when trying to verify continuous ingest. https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1065 On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:57 PM Christopher wrote: > > Accumulo Developers, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.9.3. > > This supersedes RC1 an

Re: Combining output of multiple filters/iterators

2019-03-29 Thread Josh Elser
You cannot feasibly hold onto some intermediate batch of nodes in memory. You're invalidating the general premise of how Accumulo iterators are meant to work in doing this. Further, an Iterator can _only_ safely operate within one row of a table. Two adjacent rows may be located on two differen

Re: Combining output of multiple filters/iterators

2019-03-29 Thread Enas Alkawasmi
Thank you for this suggestion. i have one question, c I pass options to the new source that are from the result of the current iterator? . the new iterator need to get the parent nodes from the the current one how can enforce the iterator to wait for the result form its preceding iterator? -- Se

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.3-rc2

2019-03-29 Thread Keith Turner
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:57 PM Christopher wrote: > > -1 due to https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1064 Do you know if this is a new bug since 1.9.2? Or does the same problem exist in 1.9.2, 1.9.1, etc? > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:34 PM Mike Miller wrote: > > > > -0 > > Successfully

Re: Combining output of multiple filters/iterators

2019-03-29 Thread Keith Turner
You may be able to use the deepCopy() method. This allows an iterator to create multiple copies of its source. Then it can seek each copy separately. Deep copies should be created in the init method. The following is an example of this. https://github.com/apache/accumulo/blob/rel/1.9.2/core/s

Re: Combining output of multiple filters/iterators

2019-03-29 Thread Enas Alkawasmi
What do you mean by Christopher Tubbs-2 wrote > single iterator as a composition > of other, smaller components. what type of components are those? can you provide template code structure that I can follow in my code?. Do you think mapreduce can fit to my problem? -- Sent from: http://apache-a