Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.5.4-rc1

-1 (non-binding) Fix now and it'll be fixed here and in 1.6.x. On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > -1 > > * signatures check out > * checksums match > * licensing errors noted in ACCUMULO-3988 > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Josh Elser

Re: Review Request 23393: ACCUMULO-2423 Clean up shell scripts

/#comment84108 should be able to consolidate some of the simple negations: egrep -v '(grep|ssh|etc)' assemble/bin/tup.sh https://reviews.apache.org/r/23393/#comment84109 not sure of origins, but 42 would be more amusing - Alex Moundalexis On July 10, 2014, 8:04 p.m., Mike Drob wrote

Re: Review Request 23393: ACCUMULO-2423 Clean up shell scripts

On July 16, 2014, 1:11 p.m., Alex Moundalexis wrote: assemble/bin/stop-here.sh, line 42 https://reviews.apache.org/r/23393/diff/4/?file=628031#file628031line42 prefer egrep -q '(localhost|127.0.0.1)' rather than escaping the pipe Mike Drob wrote: parenthesis are necessary

Re: moving rat to a profile?

This kind of response is hardly conducive to prospective contributors. We should consider ourselves lucky whenever a contributor provides a patch, let alone runs a build. Expecting a new contributor be fully aware of the Apache licensing details isn't realistic, much less being aware of the

Re: moving rat to a profile?

to set the ignoreErrors flag to false. This can be part of committer onboarding. Bill On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/17/14, 1:47 PM, Alex Moundalexis wrote: This kind of response is hardly conducive to prospective contributors. We

Re: Review Request 22458: ACCUMULO-2891 check for masters file before grep

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22458/#review45386 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alex Moundalexis On June 11, 2014, 2:20 p.m

Re: Review Request 22403: ACCUMULO-2787 Tune max open file recommendation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22403/#review45249 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alex Moundalexis On June 10, 2014, 3:35 p.m

Re: Accumulo Summit Hackathon

I would love to see metrics2 from Hadoop Common implemented. Easier Ganglia integration without the use of JMX and conversion utilities. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1817 I knew I remembered an issue being open. :) On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Tamburello, Paul [USA]

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want contributors assigning to themselves?

As a contributor, I like this approach. I'm able to through and assign an issue to myself without pestering anyone else. I like the incentive-based approach for prospective contributors: have a committer assign an issue to a user after they express interest in working it, then give them

Re: [DISCUSS] DRAFT End of Life for Accumulo 1.4

The last paragraph, is it: a) an instruction to work on the 1.4 line? b) saying that work on the 1.4 line will cease? On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Sean Busbey busbey+li...@cloudera.comwrote: Presented for feedback / discussion: draft ANNOUNCE message for the user@accumulo list. I think

Re: [VOTE] end of life plan for 1.4 branch

voting +1 than -1. Vote will remain open for 72 hours, until Tuesday, May 6 2014, 20:40 UTC -- Alex Moundalexis Solutions Architect Cloudera Government Solutions

Re: Follow up on integration of Accumulo with Cloudera Manager

I asked, he responded [2]. Short version, no. But contact him directly if you have questions. [1] https://twitter.com/nattyice/status/461239176118038528 On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Alex Moundalexis al...@clouderagovt.comwrote: Has anyone asked if Natty intends to contribute the Kiji CSD

Re: [VOTE] Website update

://accumulo.apache.org/bylaws.html -- // Bill Havanki // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions // 443.686.9283 -- // Bill Havanki // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions // 443.686.9283 -- Alex Moundalexis Solutions Architect Cloudera Government Solutions

RE: [DISCUSS] Accumulo blog

+1 to not reinventing the wheel On Apr 8, 2014 6:53 PM, dlmar...@comcast.net wrote: Not sure exactly who pays for this type of service. The Apache blog is free and just requires interested parties to write articles as they see fit and likely a vote to publish. I don't see any reason why we

Re: [DISCUSS] Reviewing design documents

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote: The localized commenting on reviewboard is nice, but making updates to the document is definitely not fun. Why not use GitHub? it provides most of what you're using RB for now, but: - Markdown is easily edited/previewed

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop RPM/DEB packaging from maven build

packaging. g) Strip them out and defer to whatever downstream maintainers decide to do. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii -- Alex Moundalexis Solutions Architect Cloudera Government Solutions

Re: CMS diff: Apache Accumulo Git WIP

. See http://accumulo.staging.apache.org/git.html Not sure what you did differently from the other code blocks... On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Alex Moundalexis anonym...@apache.orgwrote: Clone URL (Committers only): https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http

Re: Review Request 18625: ACCUMULO-2145 Create upgrade test framework

/#comment66531 Script is performing a LOT of setup and I/O within the temp directory, would strongly recommend passing the desired working directory as an argument; easier to re-use script to do multiple test runs with different configurations. - Alex Moundalexis On Feb. 28, 2014, 2:23 p.m