ot;-Daccumulo.native.lib.path=${lib}/native")
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 9:29 AM Jeffrey Zeiberg wrote:
> Jeffrey Manno (ASRC Federal) and Jeffrey Zeiberg (ASRC Federal) have
> discovered that adding a few new JVM options to the JAVA_OPTS set prevented
> crashing and increase system per
+1
Verified hashes
Ran 'mvn clean package -Psunny' and unit tests with success.
Successfully ran instance with Uno and tested some of the basic shell
features.
Successfully ran a short continuous ingest and bulk ingest test then
scanned data, on a local machine.
Successfully performed compaction a
You can try upgrading java to see if that helps. For reference, my version
is 1.8.0_201.
Which maven command are you using to build accumulo 2.0?
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:41 AM d resnik
wrote:
> I am trying to build accumulo 2.0 (master) to work on a ticket, but I keep
> getting this error:
>
I have ran into this issue before. I believe it has something to do with
the second part Christopher mentioned.
I know installing snappy into the OS only causes more headaches. I can take
a deeper look into it tomorrow.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:31 PM Christopher wrote:
> You might need to insta
adding the libsnappy.so.1 file manually.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:36 PM Jeffrey Manno
wrote:
> I have ran into this issue before. I believe it has something to do with
> the second part Christopher mentioned.
> I know installing snappy into the OS only causes more headaches. I can
> t
Zstandard. I
> put some notes on the issue here if you want to try building Hadoop:
> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/438
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:03 PM Jeffrey Manno
> wrote:
>
> > I did some more digging on this. It does appear that snappy is not bei
Out of available ones, which do you think is best? There is zStandard and a
few others I can't recall.
On Fri, May 31, 2019, 4:48 PM Keith Turner wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM Jeffrey Manno
> wrote:
>
> > That makes sense. Do you think we should update accumulo-
+1 Confirmed it was able to build with -Psunny on JDK 11.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:57 AM Owens, Mark wrote:
> +1 for starting 2.0 release process.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Coleman
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 7:56 AM
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 2.0.0 home str
Just giving an update on where my testing is at in case I forget.
So far haven't noticed any errors. I have been running continuous ingest on
both a 10 tserver EC2 cluster and on my machine for roughly ~17 hours. I do
get the tracing spans being dropped warning on the Ec2 side. Not sure of
that ca
+1
Built cluster with fluo.
Ran ci with and without agitation for extended period.
Ran some of the RWalk modules against the cluster.
Also built the RC locally and went through the IT's successfully.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:31 AM Keith Turner wrote:
> +1
>
> Verified sigs of tar balls.
> Buil
Welcome!
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:59 PM Keith Turner wrote:
> Welcome Adam!
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:22 PM Christopher wrote:
> >
> > Devs,
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo
> > has invited Adam Lerman to become a committer and we are pleased
> > to announce
Congrats Holly! Welcome!
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 3:48 PM Keith Turner wrote:
> Welcome Holly!
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:21 PM Christopher wrote:
> >
> > Devs,
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo
> > has invited Holly Keebler to become a committer and we are please
I am in favor of the LTS release schedule. I find that having a more
structured but still flexible plan for releases benefits both the users of
accumulo and developers as it gives us more defined trajectory on how to
reach certain goals.
My only issue with some LTS release projects is that sometim
+1
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:06 AM Adam Lerman wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:58 AM Christopher wrote:
>
> > As a follow-up from our previous conversation on this issue, I have
> > already started a new branch named 'main' for my own future
> > contributions (that name because it appea
+1
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:18 AM Dave Marion wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:15 AM Adam Lerman wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:14 AM Owens, Mark
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Christopher
> > > Sent: Monday, August 3, 202
+1
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:57 AM Adam Lerman wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 11:08 AM Ed Coleman wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher
> > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 11:08 AM
> > To: accumulo-dev
> > Subject: [LAZY][VOTE] Rename the 1.9 branch
-1
I tested a 10 node cluster (8 workers) with continuous ingest both with and
without agitation and also random walk without agitation, each for 24 hour
periods.
I ran into the same issues mentioned above which is the reasoning behind
the vote. I don't have any additional information to add but
ed to be checked first). Mike is unavailable
> today due to personal matters, so would be unlikely to call the vote
> himself. However, based on this new information, I will wait until you
> can report back.
>
> Jeffrey Manno: you said you were able to observe the same issue that
>
Verification MR job on the local cluster here completed with :
REFERENCED=6079512572
UNREFERENCED=2000242
I ran into a memory issue on my ec2 cluster but that seems to be only
related to the hadoop side of things. I am trying to figure out a way
around it so I can properly run the verification MR
Yes it did. Same procedure for both clusters.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:08 PM Christopher wrote:
> Jeff, did that local cluster use agitation?
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 13:06 Jeffrey Manno wrote:
>
> > Verification MR job on the local cluster here completed with :
> >
&
essage-
> > From: Mike Miller
> > Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 11:50 AM
> > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> > Subject: New committer/PMC member: Jeffrey Manno
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo has invited
> > Jeffrey Manno
Congrats ed!
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020, 6:03 PM Tony Kurc wrote:
> Congrats Ed!
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020, 6:01 PM Michael Wall wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the clarification and well wishes Niclas.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:40 PM Niclas Hedhman
> wrote:
> > >
> > > A small nitpick;
I am doing a CI on a 12 node cluster (using fluo-muchos) currently. I will
come in tomorrow to check on it but the other tests probably won't get done
until next week as well.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:16 AM Mike Miller wrote:
> FYI I plan to do a round of Continuous Ingest testing on EC2 for t
+1
Created a 12 node (9 workers) cluster with ec2 using fluo-muchos. Ran CI
without agitator for 27~ hours.
Verify completed successfully without any undefined nodes. Hadoop 2.10.0
and zookeeper 3.6.1 and Java 11. I forgot to copy down the specific stats
on the amount ingested.
* Ran random-walk
+1
- Ran and successfully completed Sunny day tests.
- Verified checksums and signature keys
- Built from src on our local cluster and performed basic operations and
some basic testing.
- Created a 12 node cluster (9 workers) with ec2. Ran CI w/o agitator for
~25 hours. Hadoop 3.3.0, zookeeper 3.
Congrats Karthick!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:26 AM Tushar Dhadiwal
wrote:
> Congratulations Karthick!
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 13:43, Christopher wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo
> > has invited Karthick Narendran to become a committer and PMC
> > membe
Hello everyone,
I am reaching out to see if anyone is free/willing to review my Upgrade to
Jline3 <https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1824> PR. Any feedback
would be greatly appreciated, specifically on the tests and on any feature
that is desired for accumulo-shell.
Thanks!
Jeffrey Manno
om/apache/accumulo/issues/2035>.
This change is more aimed to be a proof of concept. There are possible cons
to this approach but before I proceed further I wanted to gather feedback
on it. Any other ideas on a possible solution are also welcomed.
Thanks!
Jeffrey Manno
Hello,
That is an interesting error. I will take a closer look into this to see if
I can help.
Can you run the command 'mvn clean package -PskipQA' and see if the same
error occurs for that one?
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:24 AM Christine Buss
wrote:
> the directory does exist:
>
>
> acc
Welcome, Dominic! Congrats.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 1:41 PM Christopher wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Accumulo has invited
> Dominic Garguilo to become a committer and PMC member and we are
> pleased to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Dominic has been contribut
Looks good to me.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:29 AM Dominic Garguilo <
dominic.gargu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:13 AM Mike Miller wrote:
>
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 9:34 AM Dave Marion wrote:
> >
> > > Looks good.
> > >
> >
+1
Verified Psunny tests pass. Confirmed sha512 matches.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:21 AM dev1 wrote:
> +1
>
> Verified:
>
> Sunny day tests pass with no issues (mvn verify -Psunny -DreuseForks-false)
> Commit hash matches
> sha512 checksums for src and binary tar files match expected
>
> Ed Co
Congrats and welcome!
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:43 AM Dave Marion wrote:
> Congrats Chris!
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:26 AM Dominic Garguilo
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats and welcome, Chris!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:15 AM dev1 wrote:
> >
> > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for A
+1.
- Validated checksums.
- Did some minor random-walk and ingest testing against a single node
instance.
- Ran entire IT suite and Sunny day suite. The only failure was a known
flaky IT (FateStarvationIT)
The only note I had is I did see several spotbug errors occur during
+1
I did run into a few flaky tests but none seem to warrant a stoppage to
this release candidate. Two common ones are SuspendTabletsIT and
DeleteTableDuringSplitIT.
Other checks I did:
- Ran the entire test suite, along with sunny day tests.
- Verified checksums.
- Did some small inges
+1
Verified checksums. Initiated ingest testing with fluo-uno and
accumulo-testing.
Ran ITs.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 7:04 PM Keith Turner wrote:
> +1
>
> Ran CI test w/ agitation on a 10 node cluster for a few hours. Ingested
> and verified ~8B entries. Used the default accumuo-testing agita
Welcome Kevin!
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 8:21 PM Tony Kurc wrote:
> Congrats Kevin
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 7:24 PM Adam Lerman wrote:
>
> > Welcome!
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 7:22 PM Brian Loss wrote:
> >
> > > Welcome Kevin!
> > >
> > > > On Jul 25, 2024, at 4:37 PM, Christopher
> wr
37 matches
Mail list logo
