Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3 and our dependencies generally

There is a 3.0.0-alpha4 release currently available as a non-snapshot version. I'm not sure it comes with API stability guarantees at all, IIRC the Hadoop community is planning on providing that for their betas. Mike On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Christopher wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3 and our dependencies generally

+1 from me, too, but I'd like to review what actually changes in master for the migration to happen. I don't know much about Hadoop 3. I'm curious what the releases will look like (AFAIK, it's only snapshot builds right now; is that correct?), how our dependencies will change, and what API

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3 and our dependencies generally

+1 sounds like a good idea to me. On 8/3/17 10:08 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: Hi Folks! I think we need to start being more formal in planning for Hadoop 3. They're up to 3.0.0-alpha4 and are pushing towards API-locking betas[1]. What do folks think about starting to push on an Accumulo 2.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3 and our dependencies generally

I am in favor of going to Hadoop 3 for Accumulo 2. If we do this then Accumulo 2 can not release until after Hadoop 3 does. Any idea when Hadoop 3 will release? On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi Folks! > > I think we need to start being more formal

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3 and our dependencies generally

All, For what it's worth, I'd attempted to run both 1.7.x and 1.8.x on Hadoop 3 and ran into a fairly straightforward dependency issue [1] that, when addressed, should allow current Accumulo versions to run on Hadoop 3. Hopefully this means that it's not a large lift to get to the point you're

[DISCUSS] Hadoop 3 and our dependencies generally

Hi Folks! I think we need to start being more formal in planning for Hadoop 3. They're up to 3.0.0-alpha4 and are pushing towards API-locking betas[1]. What do folks think about starting to push on an Accumulo 2.0 release that only supports Hadoop 3? It would let us move faster, which we'll need