[TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-21 Thread Christopher
Accumulo Developers, The following is a **TEST** release candidate (no need to vote) for Accumulo 1.7.4. As recently discussed, it's time for a 1.7.4 release. This candidate represents my test of the build system as it currently exists. Please use these artifacts to do any relevant testing. If th

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-26 Thread Keith Turner
I am going to run a 24 hr continuous ingest test against this RC. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Christopher wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > The following is a **TEST** release candidate (no need to vote) for > Accumulo 1.7.4. > As recently discussed, it's time for a 1.7.4 release. This candi

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-26 Thread Mike Miller
I will try running randomwalk for as long as possible against this release candidate. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Keith Turner wrote: > I am going to run a 24 hr continuous ingest test against this RC. > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Christopher wrote: > > Accumulo Developers, > > >

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-26 Thread Keith Turner
I found the following while running continuous ingest test. I can fix this, unless someone else wants to try. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4832 On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Christopher wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > The following is a **TEST** release candidate (no need

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-26 Thread Mike Miller
Results from "mvn clean verify" on my MAC work machine: [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] TabletStateChangeIteratorIT.test:100 No tables should need attention expected:<0> but was:<1> [ERROR] Errors: [ERROR] NamespacesIT>AccumuloClusterIT.teardownCluster:223 » TestTimedOut test timed o... [ERROR] Ch

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-27 Thread Keith Turner
I ran mvn verify against fc75402, slightly newer than rc0 and saw the following failures. [INFO] Results: [INFO] [ERROR] Errors: [ERROR] RollWALPerformanceIT.testWalPerformance:126->testWalPerformanceOnce:116->getAverage:101->ingest:67 » TestTimedOut [ERROR] org.apache.accumulo.test.replicatio

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-28 Thread Keith Turner
I completed a successful run of continuous ingest on 8 EC2 nodes using this RC. Ran ingest for about 21 to 22 hours and then verified. I did not agitate. org.apache.accumulo.test.continuous.ContinuousVerify$Counts REFERENCED=28627507418 UNREFERENCED=800114

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-28 Thread Mike Miller
I was able to run Randomwalk overnight against a 7 node EC2 Centos cluster using Muchos with 4 walkers. I disabled the replication test since it was unstable, see ACCUMULO-4833 . 3 out of the 4 walkers failed reporting errors: - 2 walkers repor

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-03-14 Thread Christopher
I'm still seeing some test failures in 1.7 and 1.8/1.9 branches that I'm trying to work through before I prepare another release candidate. The "hang forever" bug in ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4847) that was presumed to be a flaky test (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/A

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-03-15 Thread Mike Miller
I still have logs saved from last year when I was looking at ChaoticBalancerIT and CyclicReplicationIT. So they at the very least have been flaky for a while. But sadly I didn't get anywhere with them. I can revisit. I don't see RollWALPerformanceIT in 1.7. It looks like this was added in the

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-03-15 Thread Christopher
I think RollWALPerformanceIT was related to Eric's WAL improvements in 1.8. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:09 PM Mike Miller wrote: > I still have logs saved from last year when I was looking at > ChaoticBalancerIT and CyclicReplicationIT. So they at the very least have > been flaky for a while. B

Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-03-15 Thread Mike Miller
I *think* I finally figured out the ChaoticBalancerIT... https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/401 On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Christopher wrote: > I think RollWALPerformanceIT was related to Eric's WAL improvements in 1.8. > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:09 PM Mike Miller wrote: > > > I

Re[2]: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0

2018-02-27 Thread J. Mark Owens
al Message -- From: "Mike Miller" To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Sent: 2/26/2018 4:56:24 PM Subject: Re: [TEST][VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.4-rc0 Results from "mvn clean verify" on my MAC work machine: [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] TabletStateChangeIteratorIT.test:100 No tables should need att