Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

sick. > > > > There are some comments that need incorporated into the release notes > > which I'll try to get wrapped up tonight or tomorrow. > > > > Ed Coleman > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] &

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

ghting getting sick. > > There are some comments that need incorporated into the release notes > which I'll try to get wrapped up tonight or tomorrow. > > Ed Coleman > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

up tonight or tomorrow. > > Ed Coleman > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:32 PM > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed) > > It's been 2 weeks

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

ed into the release notes > which I'll try to get wrapped up tonight or tomorrow. > > Ed Coleman > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:32 PM > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] A

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

t; > -Original Message- > From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:32 PM > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed) > > It's been 2 weeks since the vote passed, and I had some t

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

> > +1 - 3 > > > 0 - 0 > > > -1 - 0 > > > > > > I will begin working on the release notes and other release > > > artifacts forthwith. > > > > > > Ed Coleman > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > F

RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 9:32 PM To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed) It's been 2 weeks since the vote passed, and I had some time today to help out with some of the outstanding release tasks. I've been sick half of that time

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

e voting criteria (+72 hours, at > > least 3 +1 votes) and has passed. Vote results: > > > > +1 - 3 > > 0 - 0 > > -1 - 0 > > > > I will begin working on the release notes and other release artifacts > > forthwith. > > > > Ed Coleman > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

mailto:d...@etcoleman.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 7:36 AM > > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 > > > > Accumulo Developers, > > > > > > > > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.3.

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

on the release notes and other release artifacts > forthwith. > > Ed Coleman > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Coleman [mailto:d...@etcoleman.com] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 7:36 AM > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 > > Accum

RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 - vote closed (passed)

...@etcoleman.com] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 7:36 AM To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.3. This candidate contains two changes from 1.7.3-rc1: - https://issues.apache.org/jira

Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

facilitate meeting these two somewhat > conflicting goals, +1 from me, and of course, whatever is the will of the > group. > > > > Ed Coleman > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] > > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 5

Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

he.org] Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 5:49 PM To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 Okay Ed, glad to know I'm not the only one, but also glad to know that they all do pass sometimes. It looks like the vote thread got enough +1s to p

RE: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

March 13, 2017 5:49 PM To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 Okay Ed, glad to know I'm not the only one, but also glad to know that they all do pass sometimes. It looks like the vote thread got enough +1s to pass (if you're ready

Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

> > x > > x > > x > > > ShellServerIT.trace:1444 > > x > > > > x > > > > > > > > > TabletStateChangeIteratorIT.test:100 No tables should need attention > expected:<0> but was:<1> > > x > > > >

Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

testWriteSpeed:103 log should be faster than flush > > > > > > > > x > > > > > > > > x > > > > > > > > x > > > > > > > > x > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

; x > > > > > > x > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FateStarvationIT.run:79 » Runtime java.lang.RuntimeException: > > org.apache.zooke... > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

edOut > test ti... > > > > x > > > > x > > > > x > > > > x > > > > x > > > > x > > > > > > ShellServerIT.trace:1444 > > > > x > > > > > > > > x > > > > > > >

Re: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

ntermittent failures with 1.7.3-rc1 and 1.7.3-rc2. -Original Message- From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 1:53 AM To: Accumulo Dev List<dev@accumulo.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 +1, reluctantly, due to Kerbe

RE: Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

v List <dev@accumulo.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 +1, reluctantly, due to KerberosRenewalIT failures described below. Verified hashes/sigs/javadoc jars/source jars/git SHA1/tarball contents/license stuffs/ITs. I could not get KerberosRenewalIT to pa

Intermittent IT failures - was RE: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

v List <dev@accumulo.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2 +1, reluctantly, due to KerberosRenewalIT failures described below. Verified hashes/sigs/javadoc jars/source jars/git SHA1/tarball contents/license stuffs/ITs. I could not get KerberosRenewalIT to pass at all (I

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

+1, reluctantly, due to KerberosRenewalIT failures described below. Verified hashes/sigs/javadoc jars/source jars/git SHA1/tarball contents/license stuffs/ITs. I could not get KerberosRenewalIT to pass at all (I tried half a dozen times). It keeps timing out. It looks like it's supposed to

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

I also verified the rfile fix. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > +1 > > Did the following : > > * Was able to build Fluo against jars in staging repo. > * Sigs checkout for tarballs > * No diffs between src tarball and rc2 branch > * Looked at diffs

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

+1 (binding) All checks from previous re-pass. Verified ACCUMULO-4600 is fixed by following the same steps as last time. Ed Coleman wrote: Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.3. This candidate contains two changes from 1.7.3-rc1: -

[VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.3-rc2

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.7.3. This candidate contains two changes from 1.7.3-rc1: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4600 - shell does not fall back to accumulo-site.xml when on classpath. -