Thanks, Josh!
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Working on it..
Christopher wrote:
By my tally, the vote passed with:
+1: 12
+0: 1
It looks like we can go ahead and update the relevant
http://accumulo.apache.org/versioning.html
Josh Elser wrote:
Working on it..
Christopher wrote:
By my tally, the vote passed with:
+1: 12
+0: 1
It looks like we can go ahead and update the relevant documentation on
the
website. Any volunteers?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
By my tally, the vote passed with:
+1: 12
+0: 1
It looks like we can go ahead and update the relevant documentation on the
website. Any volunteers?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Bill Havanki bhava...@clouderagovt.com
wrote:
+1
On
+1
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future releases.
This vote is subject to majority approval and will remain
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future releases.
This vote is subject to majority approval and will remain open for 72 hours.
+1: Adopt semantic versioning for all future releases
+0: Don't care
-1: Do not adopt semantic versioning because
+1
Billie Rinaldi wrote:
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future releases.
This vote is subject to majority approval and will remain open for 72 hours.
+1: Adopt semantic versioning for all future releases
+0: Don't care
-1: Do not adopt
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future releases.
This vote is subject to majority approval and will remain open for 72
hours.
+1: Adopt semantic versioning for
+1
- Original Message -
From: Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org
To: Accumulo Dev List dev@accumulo.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 1:23:02 PM
Subject: [VOTE] adoption of semver
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Keith Turner ke...@deenlo.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future releases.
This vote is subject to majority
+0
Just for clarification, this vote isn't defining what the semver applies
to? I presume that means the same things already covered in Section 9 API
from the README[1]?
[1]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=README;h=a9f4645186c6431a0b68d115c7a92d18753c36f1;hb=HEAD
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
+0
Just for clarification, this vote isn't defining what the semver applies
to? I presume that means the same things already covered in Section 9 API
from the README[1]?
[1]:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
+0
Just for clarification, this vote isn't defining what the semver applies
to? I presume that means the same things already covered in Section 9 API
from the README[1]?
[1]:
+1 for semver version 2.0.0
Assuming this passes, let's make sure we grab a copy for posterity and
post it on our site.
Adam
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future
Adam, the vote isn't for 2.0.0, it's for all future releases. Can you
please clarify your vote?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote:
+1 for semver version 2.0.0
Assuming this passes, let's make sure we grab a copy for posterity and
post it on our site.
Adam
I think he meant semver-2.0.0, not Accumulo-2.0.0.. :)
John Vines wrote:
Adam, the vote isn't for 2.0.0, it's for all future releases. Can you
please clarify your vote?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Adam Fuchsafu...@apache.org wrote:
+1 for semver version 2.0.0
Assuming this passes,
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future releases.
This vote is subject to majority approval and will remain open for 72
hours.
+1: Adopt semantic versioning for
Yup, all future releases should use semver version 2.0.0.
Adam
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:59 PM, John Vines vi...@apache.org wrote:
Adam, the vote isn't for 2.0.0, it's for all future releases. Can you
please clarify your vote?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org
+1
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Billie Rinaldi bil...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to call a vote on adopting semantic versioning (
http://semver.org/) for future releases.
This vote is subject to majority approval and will remain open for 72
hours.
+1: Adopt semantic versioning for
18 matches
Mail list logo