Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

8.0. > > Git Commit: > ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d > Branch: > 1.8.0-rc3 > > If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: > git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s rel/1.8.0 > ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d &

Re: ACCUMULO-4423 in 1.8.0 (Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3)

;> * No unexpected binaries in source-release > >>>>> * japi compat report looks fine (see note about IteratorAdapter > >> below) > >>>>> * Verified diffs over 1.8.0-rc2 (they are as expected) > >>>>> * CI on rc2 was good (see rc2 vote for d

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

osh Elser > >> wrote: > >>>>>> +1 (binding) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * xsum/sigs match > >>>>>> * No unexpected binaries in source-release > >>>>>> * japi compat report looks

ACCUMULO-4423 in 1.8.0 (Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3)

ss (in public API) IteratorAdapter which extends a non-public API class (o.a.a.c.i.IteratorAdapter). I'm not worried about this because Mock has been deprecated for a bit. Michael Wall wrote: Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit:

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

n all unit and integration tests > >> > > * Stood up a single node instance locally with the bin-tarball > >> > > > >> > > There are some incompatibilities with a Mock class (in public API) > >> > > IteratorAdapter which extends a non-public API class > >>

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

FYI just found this bug that is also in 1.8.0-rc3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4445 On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > This vote fails with > > two +1s > one +0s > > There was also a +0 and +1 that came in after the vote expired. &

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

has been deprecated for a bit. Michael Wall wrote: Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit: ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d Branch: 1.8.0-rc3 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be create

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

Verified diffs over 1.8.0-rc2 (they are as expected) > > > > > * CI on rc2 was good (see rc2 vote for details, did not retest > given > > > > > previous point) > > > > > * Ran all unit and integration tests > > > > > * Stood up a single node

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

with the bin-tarball > > > > > > > > There are some incompatibilities with a Mock class (in public API) > > > > IteratorAdapter which extends a non-public API class > > > > (o.a.a.c.i.IteratorAdapter). I'm not worried

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

t; There are some incompatibilities with a Mock class (in public API) >> > > IteratorAdapter which extends a non-public API class >> > > (o.a.a.c.i.IteratorAdapter). I'm not worried about this because Mock >> has >> > > been deprecated for a bit. >> > > >> > > M

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

r which extends a non-public API class > > > (o.a.a.c.i.IteratorAdapter). I'm not worried about this because Mock > has > > > been deprecated for a bit. > > > > > > Michael Wall wrote: > > > > > >> Accumulo Developers,

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

> > > > Michael Wall wrote: > > > >> Accumulo Developers, > >> > >> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. > >> > >> Git Commit: > >> ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d > >> Branch: > >> 1.8.0-rc3

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. >> >> Git Commit: >> ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d >> Branch: >> 1.8.0-rc3 >> >> If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: >> git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0&#

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

been deprecated for a bit. Michael Wall wrote: Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit: ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d Branch: 1.8.0-rc3 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apach

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

wing candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. > > > > Git Commit: > > ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d > > Branch: > > 1.8.0-rc3 > > > > If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: > > git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s rel/1.8.0 > >

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

velopers, > > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. > > Git Commit: > ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d > Branch: > 1.8.0-rc3 > > If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: > git tag -f -

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

Just to complete this thread, 4428 has been removed from 1.8.1 as the bug is not applicable. There is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4333 for testing WAL GC in 1.8. I have created an RC3 and sent out a vote email On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Err, strike

[VOTE] Accumulo 1.8.0-rc3

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.8.0. Git Commit: ad281753325b4d9d593aa02ba11a1041ded5296d Branch: 1.8.0-rc3 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.8.0' -s

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

Err, strike that. Just saw https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428 I'm pretty sure this is saying that we will never remove WALs for old TServers. We should be looking at this before cutting another release. Josh Elser wrote: +1 Michael Wall wrote: I am working on an RC3 right

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

+1 Michael Wall wrote: I am working on an RC3 right now. If anyone thinks this needs to hold the RC, let me know soon. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Josh Elser wrote: Timing out is new for me (although, I think Sean might have seen that on a different replication test?) https://issues.

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

I am working on an RC3 right now. If anyone thinks this needs to hold the RC, let me know soon. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Timing out is new for me (although, I think Sean might have seen that on a > different replication test?) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

Timing out is new for me (although, I think Sean might have seen that on a different replication test?) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4389 is an open issue I need to find time to return to related to replication. If you can capture the minicluster directory and the failsafe-r

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

I'm still getting a few failures, but they usually pass when rerun: https://jenkins.revelc.net/job/Accumulo-1.8-ITs/lastBuild/org.apache.accumulo$accumulo-test/testReport/ The replication one timing out after 10 minutes is a bit concerning, but it's not new. On Sun, Aug 28, 2016, 18:33 Josh Elser

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

We're ready to go now, Mike. Michael Wall wrote: I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets. See 1.8.0 Dave, Sean and Christopher, please take a look at these tickets and move them to 1.8.1 or let

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

I think 4421 is ready to go btw (given the renewal thread being borked for the Tracer, it would be good to get this in 1.8.0 too). I will commit later tonight or tmrw if no one beats me to the punch. Sean Busbey wrote: yeah, any of mine are fine for bumping. They've been a problem for a while.

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

This must be a periodic failure, because Jenkins just successfully ran it. However, it fails more often than not for me. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Yeah, those VolumeITs are brutal to reason about. If you get stuck, > leave a note on JIRA. I can try to find some time thi

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

Yeah, those VolumeITs are brutal to reason about. If you get stuck, leave a note on JIRA. I can try to find some time this weekend to dig in. Christopher wrote: I'm currently bisecting to figure out what's going on with ACCUMULO-4425. The test isn't very well documented, and there's no server-s

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

I'm currently bisecting to figure out what's going on with ACCUMULO-4425. The test isn't very well documented, and there's no server-side problems, so I'm trying to infer from code what the test conditions the test is trying to evaluate actually are. We need to do a better job of commenting to expl

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

yeah, any of mine are fine for bumping. They've been a problem for a while. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > I would assume that ACCUMULO-4422 can be bumped as it's not a blocker, but I > should be able to run the tests I had asked Sean to do locally here and > speed things up

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

I would assume that ACCUMULO-4422 can be bumped as it's not a blocker, but I should be able to run the tests I had asked Sean to do locally here and speed things up. I think I also owe Sean a read through on ACCUMULO-4421. Let me try to help there too. Michael Wall wrote: I was going to mak

Re: 1.8.0 RC3

Christopher re-opened 3948 and said he was testing a patch. - Original Message - From: "Michael Wall" To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 9:05:34 AM Subject: 1.8.0 RC3 I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets. See 1.8

1.8.0 RC3

I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets. See 1.8.0 Dave, Sean and Christopher, please take a look at these tickets and move them to 1.8.1 or let me know a timeframe for completion? I can take a l