My recent blog post about running Accumulo on Fedora 25 describes how to do
this using the RawLocalFileSystem implementation of Hadoop for Accumulo
volumes matching file://
https://accumulo.apache.org/blog/2016/12/19/running-on-fedora-25.html
This works with other packaging also, not just in
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
>
> Dylan Hutchison wrote:
>>>
>>> You can configure HDFS to use the RawLocalFileSystem class forfile://
>>> > URIs which is what is done for a majority of the integration tests.
>>> > Beware
>>> > that you configure the
Dylan Hutchison wrote:
You can configure HDFS to use the RawLocalFileSystem class forfile://
> URIs which is what is done for a majority of the integration tests. Beware
> that you configure the RawLocalFileSystem as the ChecksumFileSystem
> (default forfile://) will fail miserably around
; [2] https://github.com/quantcast/qfs/wiki/Migration-Guide
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Dylan Hutchison [mailto:dhutc...@cs.washington.edu]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 3:17 PM
>>> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
>>> Subject: Ru
17 3:17 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Running Accumulo on a standard file system, without Hadoop
Hi folks,
A friend of mine asked about running Accumulo on a normal file system in
place of Hadoop, similar to the way MiniAccumulo runs. How possible is this,
or how much work would it tak
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 3:17 PM
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> Subject: Running Accumulo on a standard file system, without Hadoop
>
> Hi folks,
>
> A friend of mine asked about running Accumulo on a normal file system in
> place of Hadoop, similar to the way Mi
Hi folks,
A friend of mine asked about running Accumulo on a normal file system in
place of Hadoop, similar to the way MiniAccumulo runs. How possible is
this, or how much work would it take to do so?
I think my friend is just interested in running on a single node, but I am
curious about both