On 18 Jul 2008, at 07:13, SUMIT JAIN wrote:
I am using ActiveMq 4.1.1
I have 3 consumers listening to one topic. If one of my consumer is
not
running, and the other two are running, and a message is published,
the two
consumers would process the message. and the other consumer would
miss
I am using ActiveMq 4.1.1
I have 3 consumers listening to one topic. If one of my consumer is not
running, and the other two are running, and a message is published, the two
consumers would process the message. and the other consumer would miss this
message.
Does ActiveMQ provide any solution to
Yes.. this is what we use to deploy in ServiceMix 4.0
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> It is possible to deploy ActiveMQ plug-ins as OSGi bundles?
>
> Danushka
>
> --
> Danushka Menikkumbura
> Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc.
>
> blog : htt
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44181#action_44181
]
silverhoof edited comment on AMQ-1845 at 7/17/08 8:19 PM:
--
In this sen
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44370#action_44370
]
Bryan Shaw commented on AMQ-1845:
-
Nop, we didn't set the delivery mode attibute on the produce
Hi Devs,
It is possible to deploy ActiveMQ plug-ins as OSGi bundles?
Danushka
--
Danushka Menikkumbura
Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc.
blog : http://danushka-menikkumbura.blogspot.com/
http://wso2.com/ - The Open Source SOA Company
Race condition when browsing a queue with active Producers / Consumers
--
Key: AMQ-1859
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1859
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hadrian Zbarcea reassigned AMQ-1464:
Assignee: Hadrian Zbarcea (was: Rob Davies)
> AMQ 5.0 Fanout Regression
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Fernandez updated AMQ-1489:
---
Attachment: patchfile.txt
Submitted the patch for review. With this patch, you don't have to use a
Hi ying,
I think what you are trying to achieve is not really possible with the
existing master slave architecture.
The master/slave pair are kept in sink by the master through real time
replication of broker commands to the slave. If the master dies,
clients can fail over to the slave. A copy of d
+1 yay! fingers crossed no -1s come in this time - it'll have to be a
really really good reason to -1; we can always do another release
after this one :)
2008/7/17 Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1
>
> It passed my CXF to File test this time ;)
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ...
+1
It passed my CXF to File test this time ;)
Med venlig hilsen
Claus Ibsen
..
Silverbullet
Skovsgårdsvænget 21
8362 Hørning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk
-Original Message-
From: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17. ju
Integer overflow in default settings
Key: AMQ-1858
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1858
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects Versions: 5.1.0
running activemq using maven causes NoClassDefFoundError:
org/springframework/core/io/FileSystemResource
Key: AMQ-1857
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44361#action_44361
]
Jeremy Haile commented on AMQ-1482:
---
Kevin, can you please share what the config/setup error
hi, gary,
I will see what I can do with the test but my scenario is a little
different. on the slave, I used failover as masterConnectorURI( eg.
masterConnectorURI="failover://(tcp://master:61616)) because we want to make
sure when we start master and slave, slave is attached. Using tcp, it might
ok - you're using amqstore - so does it fail building the indexes ?
On 17 Jul 2008, at 12:35, qbeukes wrote:
Firstly: Do you mean I should try to rebuild the indexes, or that it
fails
when rebuilding the indexes?
Secondly I'm not sure which one I'm using. Here is my persistence
configurati
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44359#action_44359
]
Gary Tully commented on AMQ-1845:
-
Just a thought but this sounds like the message delivery mod
ying,
do you think it would be possible to build a test case that reproduced
the problem. Possibly based on QueueMasterSlaveTest[1] or based on
something similar?
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/ft/QueueMasterSlaveTest.java?vi
Firstly: Do you mean I should try to rebuild the indexes, or that it fails
when rebuilding the indexes?
Secondly I'm not sure which one I'm using. Here is my persistence
configuration:
Quintin
rajdavies wrote:
>
> so you its fails in the same place - rebuilding the index
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44181#action_44181
]
silverhoof edited comment on AMQ-1845 at 7/17/08 3:23 AM:
--
In this sen
Ah, there is APRUtil library as well problem solved.
Richard Gillingham wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I've taken the CMS 2.2 update that uses Apache APR but when I try to build
> VC++ complains about apr_uuid.h and apr_strmatch.h being missing.
> Checking APR (1.3 and 0.9) they are missing.
>
so you its fails in the same place - rebuilding the indexes ? - you
using raw Kaha or the default - amqstore ?
On 17 Jul 2008, at 10:09, qbeukes wrote:
OK. Fuse didn't help.
qbeukes wrote:
Never mind this. I figured it out. You meant if I DONT want to use a
snapshot I should use the stabi
Hi all
I've taken the CMS 2.2 update that uses Apache APR but when I try to build
VC++ complains about apr_uuid.h and apr_strmatch.h being missing. Checking
APR (1.3 and 0.9) they are missing.
However checking the apr online docs they're there, as in for example
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-
OK. Fuse didn't help.
qbeukes wrote:
>
> Never mind this. I figured it out. You meant if I DONT want to use a
> snapshot I should use the stabilized FUSE packages. The question is
> whether or not this bug is fixed in them?
>
>
> qbeukes wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure what you meant with:
>>
>>
yep - my bad :) - yes the bug is fixed in the FUSE release (if its the
same bug that is)
On 17 Jul 2008, at 09:21, qbeukes wrote:
Never mind this. I figured it out. You meant if I DONT want to use a
snapshot
I should use the stabilized FUSE packages. The question is whether
or not
this
Never mind this. I figured it out. You meant if I DONT want to use a snapshot
I should use the stabilized FUSE packages. The question is whether or not
this bug is fixed in them?
qbeukes wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you meant with:
>
> rajdavies wrote:
>>
>> or if you do want to use a snapsho
I'm not sure what you meant with:
rajdavies wrote:
>
> or if you do want to use a snapshot - use a FUSE release - here:
> http://open.iona.com/downloads/
>
Could you elaborate please?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Urgent-java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException-in-ActiveM
This looks a bug fixed in trunk - either get 5.2-SNAPSHOT - here:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.2-SNAPSHOT/
or if you do want to use a snapshot - use a FUSE release - here:
http://open.iona.com/downloads/
cheers,
Rob
On 17 Jul 2008
that would help wouldn't it. Appologies. I don't know why I missed this part.
I tried both of these with the same data directory (the newer one downloaded
after this happens)
apache-activemq-5.0.0 apache-activemq-5.1.0
Then, it runs on:
video opt # ls -ld /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root roo
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44351#action_44351
]
Veit Guna commented on AMQ-1847:
@Dima:
Now, I can confirm your findings! After I set the jmsT
which version ?
On 17 Jul 2008, at 08:05, qbeukes wrote:
Hey,
Our queues usually grow much faster than the database can accept
data from
the consumer, so they tend to be very large. I'm not sure if this has
anything to do with it.
But the service stopped responding (queue just kept growing
Hey,
Our queues usually grow much faster than the database can accept data from
the consumer, so they tend to be very large. I'm not sure if this has
anything to do with it.
But the service stopped responding (queue just kept growing, and consumer
wasn't reading any data).
So I killed Active
33 matches
Mail list logo
