Re: Message brokerPath property change from 5.1 to 5.2

Hi Eric, Good catch. The change does stop forwarding, but possibly the problem is in the filter that stops forwarding as other parts of the code depend on the brokerPath being extended/copied appended to. In particular the enforcement of NetworkHops limited by NetworkTTL. see:

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2147) deleteTempDestination hangs when MemoryUsage.waitForSpace () is blocked

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=50226#action_50226 ] Yossi Shmulevitch commented on AMQ-2147: This a good point. I have 2 Qs: 1. why the

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2102) Master/slave out of sync with multiple consumers

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=50227#action_50227 ] Gary Tully commented on AMQ-2102: - Ying, I have applied your patch. It is simple and it works.

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-2102) Master/slave out of sync with multiple consumers

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Tully updated AMQ-2102: Attachment: slaveDispatchOnNotification.patch This patch defers dispatch on a slave til the dispatch

Re: Discuss: AMQNET-93

Well, I think this issue needs to be resolved. The informal vote and preference is for List One, so I'll adjust the code to match that style. - Jim On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, ybronsht ybron...@progress.com wrote: Jim, I understand your point about Oracle. First of all, we can tell that

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2102) Master/slave out of sync with multiple consumers

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=50230#action_50230 ] ying commented on AMQ-2102: --- hi, Gary unfortunately the patch I did yesterday does not fix this issue

Performance comparison between OpenWire and Stomp

Hi, I wondering if there's a rule of thumb to evalute impacts on bandwith of choosing OpenWire vs Stomp. This issue nay be a major trigger in my decision. Thank you. -- View this message in context:

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2094) Can't bind the connector to localhost or actuall IP correctly.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=50233#action_50233 ] Gary Tully commented on AMQ-2094: - the patch killed a unit test:

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2102) Master/slave out of sync with multiple consumers

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=50234#action_50234 ] Gary Tully commented on AMQ-2102: - sorry, my patch is still a bit of a work in progress. I was

Helping out

Hi all, So, I'd like to contribute and according to http://activemq.apache.org/contributing.html, one of the ways I can do that is to look at the test coverage report and work on improving the coverage by writing some more tests. That seemed like a good idea to me, because it fits in with my

Re: Performance comparison between OpenWire and Stomp

My rule of thumb is always use openwire unless forced to use stomp. Openwire is more compact than stomp. --Original Message-- From: Garfield071 To: ActiveMQ Dev ReplyTo: ActiveMQ Dev Subject: Performance comparison between OpenWire and Stomp Sent: Mar 5, 2009 9:37 AM Hi, I

[jira] Created: (AMQCPP-228) Segmentation Fault(coredump) on Solaris running example in version 2.2.2

Segmentation Fault(coredump) on Solaris running example in version 2.2.2 Key: AMQCPP-228 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-228 Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client

[jira] Reopened: (AMQ-975) Setting time to live to 0 fails delivery from linux to window

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitry Geurkov reopened AMQ-975: Same problem on activemq 5.2.0 running on opensolaris server message producer is running on the same

[jira] Created: (AMQ-2148) ActiveMQ 5.2.0 time to live 0 problem

ActiveMQ 5.2.0 time to live 0 problem Key: AMQ-2148 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2148 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Bug Components: Connector Affects Versions:

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-2102) Master/slave out of sync with multiple consumers

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=50238#action_50238 ] ying commented on AMQ-2102: --- this update helps. did another test and it still has the slave out of

Re: Helping out

Hi Gary, Great news, welcome aboard. The coverage report updates to the website are not fully automated but you can find a coverage report at: http://activemq.apache.org/maven/5.3-SNAPSHOT/activemq-core/cobertura/index.html All contributions are welcome, check out the issue