[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3477) Side effect when you use QueueBrowser. Missing Message in subsequent calls.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13093448#comment-13093448 ] Klaus Stake commented on AMQ-3477: -- Timothy, I am not sure if I understand you correctly. I

Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ #745

See Changes: [gtully] camel spring pool config, match concurrentConsumers to pool maxActive*num routes -- [...truncated 9275 lines...] Running org.apache.activemq.openwire.v7.ReplayCommandTest Tests run

Jenkins build is still unstable: ActiveMQ » ActiveMQ :: JAAS #745

See

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3477) Side effect when you use QueueBrowser. Missing Message in subsequent calls.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13093201#comment-13093201 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-3477: --- Would helpful if you could distill this into a JUnit

[jira] [Closed] (AMQ-3476) Stomp 1.1 - messages sent after heart-beat timeout are lost

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy Bish closed AMQ-3476. - Resolution: Cannot Reproduce The Stomp v1.1 tests have a case that sends the same CONNECT header and waits

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3478) HTTP protocol w/remote client dropping large messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13093125#comment-13093125 ] Jim Flowers commented on AMQ-3478: -- Hi, Thanks for the quick reply. I'll look at the chang

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3478) HTTP protocol w/remote client dropping large messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13093015#comment-13093015 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-3478: --- A JUnit test case reproducing the problem would help

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-3478) HTTP protocol w/remote client dropping large messages

HTTP protocol w/remote client dropping large messages - Key: AMQ-3478 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3478 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type: Bug Components: Transport

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apollo 1.0 Beta 5

+1 On 29 Aug 2011, at 02:56, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > It's been a couple of months weeks since the last Apollo beta release. > Since then several new and noteworthy features have been implemented > including: > > * APLO-67 - Support an `auto-delete:true` header on the STOMP > sub

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-3448) Zombie ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher threads - seems to consume all process File Descriptors (FD leak)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carl Allain updated AMQ-3448: - Comment: was deleted (was: De retour lundi le 29 aout. En cas d'urgence, veuillez communiquer avec Patrick

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-3448) Zombie ActiveMQ Connection Dispatcher threads - seems to consume all process File Descriptors (FD leak)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13092882#comment-13092882 ] Carl Allain commented on AMQ-3448: -- Hi, no we have not tested with latest version as we can

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-3477) Side effect when you use QueueBrowser. Missing Message in subsequent calls.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Klaus Stake updated AMQ-3477: - Attachment: apache-issue.tar.gz > Side effect when you use QueueBrowser. Missing Message in subsequent call

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-3477) Side effect when you use QueueBrowser. Missing Message in subsequent calls.

Side effect when you use QueueBrowser. Missing Message in subsequent calls. --- Key: AMQ-3477 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3477 Project: ActiveMQ Issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apollo 1.0 Beta 5

+1 On 29 August 2011 02:56, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > It's been a couple of months weeks since the last Apollo beta release. > Since then several new and noteworthy features have been implemented > including: > >  * APLO-67 - Support an `auto-delete:true` header on the STOMP > subs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apollo 1.0 Beta 5

+1 On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 21:56 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > It's been a couple of months weeks since the last Apollo beta release. > Since then several new and noteworthy features have been implemented > including: > > * APLO-67 - Support an `auto-delete:true` header on the S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apollo 1.0 Beta 5

+1 Regards -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb - The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Hi

Why does activemq-all-5.5.0 have slf??

Why does activemq-all-5.5.0 have slf?? and the versin is 1.5.x , old... -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Why-does-activemq-all-5-5-0-have-slf-tp3775754p3775754.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.