Repeated call to PooledConnection.setClientID() with the same clientId should
not raise a IllegalStateException(Setting clientID on a used Connection is not
allowed)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Torsten Mielke updated AMQ-3752:
Attachment: AMQ-3752.patch
Attaching proposed patch including JUnit test.
Repeated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220786#comment-13220786
]
Torsten Mielke commented on AMQ-3752:
-
Fixed in revision #1296094.
Exception on stopping the broker
Key: AMQ-3753
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3753
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Bhanu
I get this exception when i try to kill the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220847#comment-13220847
]
Claus Ibsen commented on AMQ-3753:
--
Can you post the full stracktrace. And log which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claus Ibsen updated AMQ-3753:
-
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Summary: Exception on stopping the broker - Timer already cancelled
intermittent failure of
org.apache.activemq.transport.vm.VmTransportNetworkBrokerTest
-
Key: AMQ-3754
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3754
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Torsten Mielke updated AMQ-3754:
Attachment: AMQ-3754.patch
Attaching a fix which updates the JUnit test.
Initially the test was
receiveNoWait blocked on same mutex as sending threads
--
Key: AMQ-3755
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3755
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220881#comment-13220881
]
Claudio Tagliola commented on AMQ-3755:
---
Some more information: we run our broker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220908#comment-13220908
]
Torsten Mielke commented on AMQ-3754:
-
Fixed in revision #1296194.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Torsten Mielke resolved AMQ-3754.
-
Resolution: Fixed
intermittent failure of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Torsten Mielke resolved AMQ-3752.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Repeated call to PooledConnection.setClientID() with the same clientId
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220928#comment-13220928
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-3753:
---
This sounds like something we saw in a SNAPSHOT build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220930#comment-13220930
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-3755:
---
Do you have a test case that reproduces the problem?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13220938#comment-13220938
]
Gary Tully commented on AMQ-3736:
-
there is no explicit cleanup of db.data, it holds the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221029#comment-13221029
]
Claudio Tagliola commented on AMQ-3755:
---
We do not have a reproducible test case, as
+1
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
It's been a month since the Apollo 1.0 release. I'd like to do a new 1.1
release to pickup a couple of bug fixes and features.
You can find the release notes at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish reopened AMQ-3750:
---
The change breaks the older stores that use ProxyMessageStore and
ProxyTopicMessage store since the calls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-3750.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Updated the stores to also override the new methods in their anonymous proxy
store
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-3751.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Updated the page, will be visible once the wiki refreshes.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-1545.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Tested here and its working fine with multiple chat windows.
Chat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish closed AMQ-1985.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
ActiveMQ Security - grant privileges on ActiveMQ.Advisory. by default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish closed AMQ-2288.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
This was fixed by AMQ-1704
AdvisoryBroker does not set up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221521#comment-13221521
]
Krishnadasan T S commented on AMQ-3736:
---
Hi,
thanks for a quick reply
We are using
+1
On 29 Feb 2012, at 17:24, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Everyone,
It's been a month since the Apollo 1.0 release. I'd like to do a new 1.1
release to pickup a couple of bug fixes and features.
You can find the release notes at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13221531#comment-13221531
]
Krishnadasan T S commented on AMQ-3736:
---
Hi,
As per documentation it is said that The
27 matches
Mail list logo