[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5277) JDBC ack does not use messageId.entryLocator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hadrian Zbarcea updated AMQ-5277: - Fix Version/s: 5.10.1 > JDBC ack does not use messageId.entryLocator > -

[jira] [Commented] (ACTIVEMQ6-61) SelectorParser package conflict with openwire tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14249313#comment-14249313 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACTIVEMQ6-61: - GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull r

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: ACTIVEMQ6-61 SelectorParser package confl...

GitHub user gaohoward opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/47 ACTIVEMQ6-61 SelectorParser package conflict with openwire tests The SelectorParser class in amq6 source code conflicts with the same class in activemq 5 client jar. The activemq 5 clien

[jira] [Created] (ACTIVEMQ6-61) SelectorParser package conflict with openwire tests

Howard Gao created ACTIVEMQ6-61: --- Summary: SelectorParser package conflict with openwire tests Key: ACTIVEMQ6-61 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-61 Project: Apache ActiveMQ 6

Jenkins build is back to stable : ActiveMQ » ActiveMQ :: Spring #1569

See

Re: [16/16] activemq git commit: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3758

-1 This is a huge change that completely alters the Job scheduler store to use a totally new store format and while the update does allow for the update from an older to a newer store this not something I would expect to see in a point release. On 12/16/2014 05:10 PM, hadr...@apache.org wrot

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-3758) Recover scheduler database option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hadrian Zbarcea updated AMQ-3758: - Fix Version/s: 5.10.1 > Recover scheduler database option > - > >

[jira] [Resolved] (AMQNET-495) Error in tight marshal handling of compacted long values reads leads to unmatched ack errors etc.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy Bish resolved AMQNET-495. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed on trunk. > Error in tight marshal handling of compacted long values read

[jira] [Updated] (AMQNET-495) Error in tight marshal handling of compacted long values reads leads to unmatched ack errors etc.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy Bish updated AMQNET-495: Fix Version/s: 1.6.5 > Error in tight marshal handling of compacted long values reads leads to > un

[jira] [Created] (AMQNET-495) Error in tight marshal handling of compacted long values reads leads to unmatched ack errors etc.

Timothy Bish created AMQNET-495: --- Summary: Error in tight marshal handling of compacted long values reads leads to unmatched ack errors etc. Key: AMQNET-495 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-495

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: documentation review fixes

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/45 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: Jms bridge fix

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/46 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: Jms bridge fix

GitHub user mtaylor opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/46 Jms bridge fix You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mtaylor/activemq-6 JMSBridgeFix Alternatively you can review and apply these

[GitHub] activemq-6 pull request: documentation review fixes

GitHub user andytaylor opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/45 documentation review fixes You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/andytaylor/activemq-6 master Alternatively you can review and

Jenkins build became unstable: ActiveMQ » ActiveMQ :: LevelDB Store #1568

See

Jenkins build became unstable: ActiveMQ » ActiveMQ :: Spring #1568

See