[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5155) Heartbeat fails in STOMP over WebSockets

2015-04-07 Thread Peter Pfort (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14482775#comment-14482775 ] Peter Pfort commented on AMQ-5155: -- It's works now. Thanks Heartbeat fails in STOMP over

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread Christian Schneider (JIRA)
Christian Schneider created AMQ-5709: Summary: Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG Key: AMQ-5709 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709 Project: ActiveMQ

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread Gary Tully (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14483063#comment-14483063 ] Gary Tully commented on AMQ-5709: - maybe we reduce the frequency - there was a fix a few

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5692) Inactivity monitor does not time out on stuck socket writes

2015-04-07 Thread Torsten Mielke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Torsten Mielke updated AMQ-5692: Attachment: AMQ-5692.pl Inactivity monitor does not time out on stuck socket writes

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5692) Inactivity monitor does not time out on stuck socket writes

2015-04-07 Thread Torsten Mielke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14483067#comment-14483067 ] Torsten Mielke commented on AMQ-5692: - Attached reproducer in AMQ-5692.pl. To reproduce

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread Christian Schneider (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14483068#comment-14483068 ] Christian Schneider commented on AMQ-5709: -- +1 to log the first try at higher

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14483110#comment-14483110 ] Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on AMQ-5709: --- Yes, I think the first log message

[jira] [Resolved] (AMQ-5707) AMQP: Investigate the affact of abort slow consumer strategy on sender links

2015-04-07 Thread Timothy Bish (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-5707. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.12.0 Added support for reacting to the ConsumerControl

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
make JIRA notifications into a JIRA list? then you subscribe into that if you like. I think github notifications should still be on the dev list though. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:43 AM, artnaseef a...@artnaseef.com wrote: Using Nabble, as I do, to keep up with the dev mailing list, this is what

[jira] [Assigned] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread clebert suconic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] clebert suconic reassigned AMQ-5709: Assignee: clebert suconic Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5710) ActiveMQConnection cleanup should not close the connection on the broker

2015-04-07 Thread Dejan Bosanac (JIRA)
Dejan Bosanac created AMQ-5710: -- Summary: ActiveMQConnection cleanup should not close the connection on the broker Key: AMQ-5710 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5710 Project: ActiveMQ

[jira] [Resolved] (AMQ-5710) ActiveMQConnection cleanup should not close the connection on the broker

2015-04-07 Thread Dejan Bosanac (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dejan Bosanac resolved AMQ-5710. Resolution: Fixed Fixed with http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/commit/c705523c

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Apr 7, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote: make JIRA notifications into a JIRA list? then you subscribe into that if you like. Many of the other projects (CXF, Camel, etc…) do have a separate “issues” list for the JIRA things. That might make sense.

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5711) [AMQP] Consumer on named temporary queue results in NullPointerException

2015-04-07 Thread Timothy Bish (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14483412#comment-14483412 ] Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-5711: --- So the NPE is not great here but what you are trying

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5712) Broker can deadlock when using queues while producers wait on disk space

2015-04-07 Thread Christopher L. Shannon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher L. Shannon updated AMQ-5712: Summary: Broker can deadlock when using queues while producers wait on disk space

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread James Carman
Agreed. +1 On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote: paste the JIRA? I will vote for it. I would keep github on dev for now.. there are a few discussions that would happen through github (embedded comments.. etc) that I think it's worth to mirror to the

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
Anything that requires assistance from the Infra team is accomplished by creating a JIRA issue. Just create a new issue in JIRA ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa) and select the Infrastructure project. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:36 PM, artnaseef a...@artnaseef.com

Re: ActiveMQ 6 Logging

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
It just seemed like a simple thing to clean up. You can refuse it because it's clear that I don't understand the configuration yet. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote: @Bruce: What's the best way to handle this: I have seen your PR:

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread artnaseef
+1 That works. It looks like the volume of github notifications is much lower - and appear to be mostly pull requests, so moving out the jira entries would be a big win. -- View this message in context:

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5712) Broker can deadlock for queues while producers wait on disk space

2015-04-07 Thread Christopher L. Shannon (JIRA)
Christopher L. Shannon created AMQ-5712: --- Summary: Broker can deadlock for queues while producers wait on disk space Key: AMQ-5712 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5712 Project:

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread artnaseef
It sounds like the Jira list is the way to go. How can I go about getting the list created and messages redirected? I think iss...@activemq.apache.org is the way to go. Art -- View this message in context:

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
I already submitted a request. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:18 PM, artnaseef a...@artnaseef.com wrote: It sounds like the Jira list is the way to go. How can I go about getting the list created and messages redirected? I think iss...@activemq.apache.org is the way to go. Art --

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9394 Vote the JIRA, I guess that will bother infra guys to do it sooner ;) On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:43 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Agreed. +1 On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
+1 Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote: paste the JIRA? I will vote for it. I would keep github on dev for now.. there are a few discussions that would happen through github (embedded comments.. etc) that I think it's worth to mirror to

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
Nabble is not controlled by the ASF at all. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:49 PM, artnaseef a...@artnaseef.com wrote: So the Infra team manages Jira and mailing lists? What about nabble - will it also be included, or is there more work to do there? -- View this message in context:

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5712) Broker can deadlock when using queues while producers wait on disk space

2015-04-07 Thread Christopher L. Shannon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher L. Shannon updated AMQ-5712: Description: I am experiencing a deadlock when using a Queue with non-persistent

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
paste the JIRA? I will vote for it. I would keep github on dev for now.. there are a few discussions that would happen through github (embedded comments.. etc) that I think it's worth to mirror to the dev... we can later move out if they start to bother. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Bruce

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread artnaseef
Hey Bruce - I would like to learn the process here. Can you help me? Was the request made simply by creating a Jira entry? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-dev-mailing-list-is-cluttered-tp4694420p4694448.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
Good point, Clebert. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9394 Vote the JIRA, I guess that will bother infra guys to do it sooner ;) On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:43 PM, James Carman

Re: ActiveMQ 6 Logging

2015-04-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
Andy Taylor is sick today and he was the one who placed it there... I will wait him back before deciding what to do ok? I think it's all ok.. just would need to check what the docs says. but i will wait for Andy. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com wrote: It

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
+1 Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote: make JIRA notifications into a JIRA list? then you subscribe into that if you like. I think github notifications should still be on the dev list though. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:43 AM, artnaseef

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread James Carman
I don't think they work that way, but it couldn't hurt. :) On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com wrote: Good point, Clebert. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread James Carman
Actually the mailing lists are different https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com wrote: Anything that requires assistance from the Infra team is accomplished by creating a JIRA issue. Just create a new issue in JIRA (

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread artnaseef
So the Infra team manages Jira and mailing lists? What about nabble - will it also be included, or is there more work to do there? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-dev-mailing-list-is-cluttered-tp4694420p4694453.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread James Carman
Unless anyone objects, I don't think we need an official VOTE. Thus far, it appears we have consensus. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote: Do we need an official vote thread for these kinds of changes? Perhaps this discussion

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Hiram Chirino
How about this.. Lets request the change 72 hours after this thread was started. So 3 days - 5 hours :) That way, we lets folks in different time zones get a chance to object if they want. After that we can call it lazy consensus and be done with it. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Bruce Snyder

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
I don't think we need a vote, but I won't stand in the way of one. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Unless anyone objects, I don't think we need an official VOTE. Thus far, it appears we have consensus. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? On Tue,

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
The purpose of the PMC chair is to represent the project to the board. I supposed it would be a good idea to vote on this change on the dev@ list. Bruce On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I think we need to have Hiram request this since he is the

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread James Carman
I think we need to have Hiram request this since he is the chair of the PMC. On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Actually the mailing lists are different https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, Bruce Snyder

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread artnaseef
I'm OK either way. This is something that can be undone without too much hassle if a later objection arises, but not without a little impact (that is messages in the interim being in a different place). -- View this message in context:

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Hiram Chirino
Do we need an official vote thread for these kinds of changes? Perhaps this discussion thread is good enough? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:14 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: I think we need to have Hiram request this since he is the chair of the PMC. On Tuesday, April 7, 2015,

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread James Carman
Sounds good. There's no reason to rush this by any stretch of the imagination. Lazy consensus is just fine for this sort of thing, I'd think. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote: How about this.. Lets request the change 72 hours after this thread was

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Jim Gomes
I'm OK with moving JIRA notices to a separate list. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015, 1:22 PM Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote: Do we need an official vote thread for these kinds of changes? Perhaps this discussion thread is good enough? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:14 PM, James Carman

[jira] [Commented] (ACTIVEMQ6-19) Disable Server Side Load Balancing on message routing

2015-04-07 Thread Justin Bertram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14484050#comment-14484050 ] Justin Bertram commented on ACTIVEMQ6-19: - How about we replace the

[jira] [Assigned] (ACTIVEMQ6-19) Disable Server Side Load Balancing on message routing

2015-04-07 Thread Justin Bertram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Bertram reassigned ACTIVEMQ6-19: --- Assignee: Justin Bertram Disable Server Side Load Balancing on message routing

[GitHub] activemq pull request: AMQ-5709 Reworking Logging on Locker

2015-04-07 Thread clebertsuconic
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/82 AMQ-5709 Reworking Logging on Locker https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709 This is about changing how the Log is done in case of not being able to lock (log only once)

Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered

2015-04-07 Thread Jim Gomes
+1 for lazy consensus. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015, 1:44 PM James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Sounds good. There's no reason to rush this by any stretch of the imagination. Lazy consensus is just fine for this sort of thing, I'd think. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Hiram Chirino

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14484095#comment-14484095 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5709: - GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:

LockFile race

2015-04-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
I took this JIRA to fix here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709 https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/82 and I discovered a race into LockFile.java Basically Lock will return false if you run the test I wrote in loop. It's non related to my change.. but I will add the test

[jira] [Resolved] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread clebert suconic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] clebert suconic resolved AMQ-5709. -- Resolution: Fixed Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5709) Logging of Database ... is locked should be done on level DEBUG

2015-04-07 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14484114#comment-14484114 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5709: - Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

Re: LockFile race

2015-04-07 Thread Gary Tully
I think the in vm case is only used in some tests, so it is not critical but would be a nice addition to have it correct. On 7 April 2015 at 22:33, Clebert Suconic clebert.suco...@gmail.com wrote: I took this JIRA to fix here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5709

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ACTIVEMQ6-19) Disable Server Side Load Balancing on message routing

2015-04-07 Thread Justin Bertram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14484050#comment-14484050 ] Justin Bertram edited comment on ACTIVEMQ6-19 at 4/7/15 10:15 PM:

[GitHub] activemq pull request: AMQ-5709 Reworking Logging on Locker

2015-04-07 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/82 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: LockFile race

2015-04-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
I can take a look on fixing it tomorrow. Take a look at my last commit later please as I have added a test for it. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote: I think the in vm case is only used in some tests, so it is not critical but would be a nice addition to

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4693) Add kerberos [SASL] authentication for TCP connectors

2015-04-07 Thread Piotr Klimczak (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14484349#comment-14484349 ] Piotr Klimczak commented on AMQ-4693: - Pushed one more commit to PR as I have realised

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ACTIVEMQ6-19) Disable Server Side Load Balancing on message routing

2015-04-07 Thread Justin Bertram (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14484050#comment-14484050 ] Justin Bertram edited comment on ACTIVEMQ6-19 at 4/8/15 2:41 AM: