I've submitted a Jira for the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6177
I'll put together a patch over the weekend :)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
> HA!
>
> Running org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.CronParserTest
>
> Tests run: 15, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skip
HA!
Running org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.CronParserTest
Tests run: 15, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.107
sec - in org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.CronParserTest
Changed my timezone from NST to EST.
Cheers,
Jamie
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Jamie G. wro
I wonder if I change my timezone if they test would pass...
Let me check :)
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:52 PM, artnaseef wrote:
> I wonder if it's timezone-related. There's odd logic in the test looking for
> 8:50, based on the snippet Jamie posted.
>
> Oddly it's using 20 minutes into the epoch a
I wonder if it's timezone-related. There's odd logic in the test looking for
8:50, based on the snippet Jamie posted.
Oddly it's using 20 minutes into the epoch as the time, and then somehow
expecting a different result if that returns 8 and 50 as follows:
if (startHours == 8 && startMinutes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/396
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/396#issuecomment-186354709
@dudaerich I merged it.. but please be aware that I made a small
modification on your original commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
On 02/19/2016 12:48 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Thank you for the suggestion.
>
> Which version of Maven & Java are you using?
I ran the tests with the following
Maven: Apache Maven 3.3.3
Tried on both: java version "1.8.0_72" and java version "1.7.0_80"
passes on each run.
> Cheers,
> Ja
> However, AFAIK, ActiveMQ 5.x does support transactional acks so, if you aim
> at good compatibility with ActiveMQ 5.x, Artemis should really also support
> them...
+1
I've copied what i'm seeing into a gist file:
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/bc2becd86ec3ce3caf98
For the unit test to pass, the current value should be 300, yet on
my platform i'm seeing Current == 120.
Still looking into why this is occurring for me...
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:18 P
Hi Tim,
Thank you for the suggestion.
Which version of Maven & Java are you using?
Cheers,
Jamie
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Christopher Shannon
wrote:
> You can use -fae so that it fails at the end and you can continue if that
> one test keeps breaking for you.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 a
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/396#issuecomment-186313352
There's a checkstyle issue. can you do this:
mvn -Pdev install -DskipTests=true
I may be able to ammend it myself this afternoon if
You can use -fae so that it fails at the end and you can continue if that
one test keeps breaking for you.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 02/19/2016 11:59 AM, Jamie G. wrote:
> > OK,
> >
> > Was there any special maven invocation? I'm just using mvn clean install.
>
>
Thank You!!
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Christopher Shannon
> wrote:
>
> Sorry about that, I have verified your ICLA is on file and gave you edit
> permissions so you should be able to edit that page now.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 AM, hqstevenson
> wrote:
>
>> I didn't ever hear
On 02/19/2016 11:59 AM, Jamie G. wrote:
> OK,
>
> Was there any special maven invocation? I'm just using mvn clean install.
same here, didn't do anything special, tried on another box and passes
there as well.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
>> On 02/19/2016 11:34 AM, J
OK,
Was there any special maven invocation? I'm just using mvn clean install.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 02/19/2016 11:34 AM, Jamie G. wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm attempting to building AMQ 5.13.1 from tag in order to test some
>> changes I'm making for AMQ-6176.
>
On 02/19/2016 11:34 AM, Jamie G. wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm attempting to building AMQ 5.13.1 from tag in order to test some
> changes I'm making for AMQ-6176.
>
> When i try to build AMQ 5.13.1 I see:
>
> Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.104
> sec <<< FAILURE! - in
Sorry about that, I have verified your ICLA is on file and gave you edit
permissions so you should be able to edit that page now.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 AM, hqstevenson
wrote:
> I didn't ever hear back on this, and I still can't edit this page
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
Hi All,
I'm attempting to building AMQ 5.13.1 from tag in order to test some
changes I'm making for AMQ-6176.
When i try to build AMQ 5.13.1 I see:
Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.104
sec <<< FAILURE! - in
org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.CronParserTest
tes
I didn't ever hear back on this, and I still can't edit this page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/How+to+unit+test+JMS+code
Will someone please grant me edit permissions so I can get the JUnit rule
added to this page?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.228332
Perhaps there is some kind of delay in the mailing list, but you appear to have
created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-405 along with a handful
of other JIRAs. Can you confirm that you are still having problems creating
JIRAs?
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "Lionel
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/395
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
> could you raise a Jira please?
I would love to but I’m not allowed to create Jira issues for ARTEMIS. If one
can allow me, my user id is lionel.cons…
Cheers,
Lionel
> TBH I don't remember what Hiram (et all) wrote on the spec. It will be
> a bug depending on what's said at the spec.
The spec says:
| Optionally, a transaction header MAY be specified, indicating that the
message acknowledgment SHOULD be part of the named transaction.
So, strictly speaking,
GitHub user dudaerich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/396
ARTEMIS-414 - [Artemis Testsuite] TemporaryQueueClusterTest#testClustâ¦
â¦eredQueue fails
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://gith
24 matches
Mail list logo
