Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy » ActiveMQ :: Tooling #1614

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy » ActiveMQ :: Log4j Appender #1614

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy » ActiveMQ :: Blueprint #1614

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Jenkins build is back to normal : ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy » ActiveMQ #1614

See

Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy » ActiveMQ :: Partition Management #1614

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy #1614

See Changes: [tabish121] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6293 [tabish121] Clean up and adjust test timeouts for CI [tabish121] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5621 --

Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy » ActiveMQ :: Console #1614

See -- [...truncated 120 lines...] Generating

Build failed in Jenkins: ActiveMQ-Trunk-Deploy » ActiveMQ :: RA #1614

See -- [...truncated 98 lines...] Generating

Re: Time for another board report for May 2016

Brett, Please include the following information about past activity in the project as requested in the last board meeting: ActiveMQ Past Activity * This report is being filed based on a request from some board members during the April 2016 meeting. The request is to recap the results of

Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory()

Not concerned about performance as it can be handled by using persistent connections. It is only the initial handshake which takes time, which is acceptable during boot up time. It is the management of keys and other resources required to do TLS. By using proxy server, we can centralize

Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory()

I guess I still don't understand the use-case. Why exactly is it necessary to offload SSL? Is it because there is concern that SSL is going to use too many resources? If so, is there solid benchmark data to back that up? If so, could you share it or provide steps to reproduce the results?

Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory()

You can have multiple cluster connections, and specify an acceptor with a different one, in such way the other nodes are not exposed to the clients. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:41 PM, abhijith wrote: > SSL offloading is the most common use case for fronting with proxy.

Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory()

SSL offloading is the most common use case for fronting with proxy. client ---TLS---> Proxy/Reverse-Proxy(ssl-offload) ---TCP--> Artemis broker. Unless you are using a container like tomcat/jboss to deploy the apps, above setup is pretty common. It also helps to have non-tls communication

Re: ActiveMQ Artemis hung on receiving after paging

I have tried your example, there was an issue with your test (you missed calling start). it works correctly after fixed the test, so I closed the issue. On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Zabelinski Andrey wrote: > I have attached a thread dump.

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-519 protocol-manager-factor...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/517 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: Use StandardCharsets more

Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/515#issuecomment-219468095 @scop you should probably use mvn install -Pdev instead of compile. There is a snapshot updated daily when there are committs, and maven will

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: Use StandardCharsets more

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/515 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-521 - fix OSGi support

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/518 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-517

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/513 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-519 protocol-manager-factor...

Github user bayern39 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/517#issuecomment-219450061 @jbertram i have fixed it,thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory()

Can you elaborate on why you would front the broker with a proxy? I'm not familiar with this use-case. Justin - Original Message - From: "abhijith" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 12:20:36 PM Subject: [Artemis] Bug in

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-519 protocol-manager-factor...

Github user jbertram commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/517#discussion_r63352943 --- Diff: artemis-jms-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/management/impl/JMSConnectionFactoryControlImpl.java --- @@ -432,6

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-519 protocol-manager-factor...

Github user bayern39 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/517#issuecomment-219415936 @mtaylor OK,i did it ,thanks for your tip! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-521 - fix OSGi support

GitHub user dejanb opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/518 ARTEMIS-521 - fix OSGi support You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/dejanb/activemq-artemis master Alternatively you can

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: Use StandardCharsets more

Github user scop commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/515#issuecomment-219401406 PR updated and force-pushed. Hopefully it passes now, `mvn compile -Pdev` failed for me due to receiving 502 errors for some deps at

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: Use StandardCharsets more

Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/515#issuecomment-219388805 @scop Hi, this looks good, there is a checkstyle error which is causing CI failure could you please update. Run with the "dev" maven profile to switch on

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: Remove redundant type arguments

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/516 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-519 protocol-manager-factor...

Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/517#issuecomment-219387544 @bayern39 Hi, you have several check style issues in your commit. Could you please fix these. To find these locally build with the dev profile `mvn

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: ARTEMIS-519 protocol-manager-factor...

GitHub user bayern39 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/517 ARTEMIS-519 protocol-manager-factory is not implemented on ConnectionFactoryControl https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-519 You can merge this pull request into a Git

Re: ActiveMQ Artemis hungs on receiving after paging

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-520 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Artemis-hungs-on-receiving-after-paging-tp4711886p4711969.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.