Hi
Isn't it time to cut a new ActiveMQ Artemis release? The previous
1.2.0 release is 5 months ago. And since the 1.0 release 1 year ago,
there has only be 1.1 and 1.2 releases.
--
Claus Ibsen
-
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
Github user exabrial closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/496
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
If you send a PR then signing a CLA isn't necessary. See here [1] for more
details on that.
Justin
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-tinkerpop-dev/201502.mbox/%3cd0fe82f6.44d33%25rve...@dotnetrdf.org%3E
- Original Message -
From: "aclayton"
To: dev@activemq.apac
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/495#issuecomment-220460874
@gaol Can you review my latest changes on paging, and this can probably be
closed?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/495#issuecomment-220460780
This is exactly the issue I was working against ð I wish I had read
your PR more properly..
I actually did but I didn't realize it was the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/527
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/527#issuecomment-220459920
thanks ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/523#issuecomment-220458254
@mtaylor/@jbertram I have added the thread to the current format with
minimal changes...
and I have a format commented out on traces that I wil
GitHub user pgfox opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/527
fixing typo in doc link
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/pgfox/activemq-artemis doc_link_update
Alternatively you can re
Will you guys require me to sign a CLA?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Adding-support-for-password-masking-to-the-Artemis-tp4711531p4712181.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/526
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/525
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/496#issuecomment-220354749
@exabrial Actually doesn't look like I have permissions to close this PR.
Could you please close it.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/496#issuecomment-220353546
@exabrial I am going to close this PR based on our discussion. We can
reopen later if need be.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/526#issuecomment-220353158
@dejanb Looks like you fixed the issue. Could you squash the commits pls.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user jbertram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/526#issuecomment-220329595
Apparently org.apache.activemq.artemis.karaf.ArtemisFeatureTest.test
failed. Can you look into this, @dejanb?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/496#issuecomment-220307610
@exabrial I'd be happy to help. I can talk to you on IRC #activemq or on
the dev list.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user dejanb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/526
ARTEMIS-521 - OSGi support - add unit test
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dejanb/activemq-artemis master
Alternativel
Github user exabrial commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/496#issuecomment-220302866
I'm not completely sure it's correct actually... a better way would be go
make the connection class an interface, rather than a final class.
Also a
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/523#issuecomment-220274192
+1 on changing just the trace log format (if possible).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/495#issuecomment-220273890
@clebertsuconic any update on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user mtaylor commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/496#issuecomment-220273790
@exabrial Hi, any chance you could update the commit message and we'll get
this merged.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Hi Lionel,
The scripts are slightly different as they do slightly different things.
The first script is for generating an Artemis instance, which sets up a new
broker in a separate directory, "artemis create broker" The other is for
running the broker "artemis run", which takes slight different a
GitHub user dudaerich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/525
ARTEMIS-527 - [Artemis Testsuite] TopicControlTest fails
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dudaerich/activemq-artemis
The Artemis sources contain two slightly different "artemis" scripts (see the
diff below).
Why not merging them and using only one script?
Cheers,
Lionel
--- artemis-distribution/src/main/resources/bin/artemis 2016-05-02
07:21:26.0 +0200
+++
artemis-cli/src/main/resources/org/apache/a
25 matches
Mail list logo
