I would like only to change default value for attribute
"slow-consumer-check-period' from 5 seconds to 5 minutes. I believe it was
original intention. Calculating msg/s rate based on 5 second time window might
be very inaccurate.
Mirek
- Original Message -
> From: "Martyn Taylor"
> To
A PMC member has to update the KEYS, since its being pointed to in the dist
repo. I actually thought I updated it in the main git repo (
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=blob;f=KEYS;h=1d3ba01711feb80ba9e8485dfb4942bda4e56a6e;hb=HEAD
)
but I guess not.
I updated the two m
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:38 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:07 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Hey guys
> >
> > While cutting the 1.5.4 release, there were a few snaf-u's I noticed.
> > Nothing crazy, but wanted to put this out there to see if it makes sense.
> >
> > - the
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> While cutting the 1.5.4 release, there were a few snaf-u's I noticed.
> Nothing crazy, but wanted to put this out there to see if it makes sense.
>
> - the contents of RELEASING.md should be on the website. the root readme
> sho
I added 1.5.5 to JIRA.
I'm not familiar with the KEYS file.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "John D. Ament"
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 8:49:18 PM
Subject: Re: Public Key
Also, would anyone mind adding a 1.5.5 release to JIRA?
John
On Tue, Mar 7, 201
Hello all,
I'd like to propose an Apache Artemis 1.5.4 release (RC1).
This revision release of Apache Artemis 1.5 contains a number of bug fixes
and improvements including:
Bug
- [ARTEMIS-919] - Issues creating jms queues in core config in broker.xml
when hot reloading configuration
- [ARTEMIS
Hey guys
While cutting the 1.5.4 release, there were a few snaf-u's I noticed.
Nothing crazy, but wanted to put this out there to see if it makes sense.
- the contents of RELEASING.md should be on the website. the root readme
should point to it.
- Update RELEASING.md with the vote template.
- Ch
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1069
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Also, would anyone mind adding a 1.5.5 release to JIRA?
John
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:45 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> Would someone mind adding my key to the KEYS file? I'm trying to roll the
> 1.5.4 Artemis release. Its below.
>
> John
>
> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
> Com
Hey guys
Would someone mind adding my key to the KEYS file? I'm trying to roll the
1.5.4 Artemis release. Its below.
John
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
mQINBFRwnMsBEACgCni5H1j6f1Ko3bdDeEbBrGlI0O+GfLcbgnXzEfMPQhsydJpV
CEQXvHEyeJiOqCEPek3qg6shNvru
This specific field is message consumption rate, i.e. no message per time
window. So we would need something like:
10msg/minute etc...
I don't mind either way, as a unit parameter or as part of the value.
Either way, we don't need to break configuration to add this improvement.
Cheers
On Tue,
Care to elaborate on what works or doesn't work means in your case?
Have you enabled message priority support on the broker?
http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html
Client side
Java
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/activemq-client/src/main/java/org/ap
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:06 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
> > 10
>
> I would suggest something more akin to what was implemented for byte
> fields (i.e. support notation like "KB", "M", "gb", etc.). For example:
>
> 10m
>
> or
>
> 30s
+1000
>
> And default to whatever time-unit is used no
> 10
I would suggest something more akin to what was implemented for byte fields
(i.e. support notation like "KB", "M", "gb", etc.). For example:
10m
or
30s
And default to whatever time-unit is used now.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "Jiri Danek"
To: dev@activemq.apache.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Martyn Taylor wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up again.
>
> One approach to this that avoids having to add new settings or change the
> default values of current config would be to add a unit parameter to the
> configuration element. For example
>
Hi Jiri,
Thanks for bringing this up again.
One approach to this that avoids having to add new settings or change the
default values of current config would be to add a unit parameter to the
configuration element. For example
10
This is just an example, but we could standardise across all co
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1069
ARTEMIS-1009 fixing ProtonTest::testFilterJMSMessageID
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq
I somehow buried this thread, sorry...
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> you're right.. I was just trying to understand Jiri's comment, and not
> actually make an evaluation on the feature.
>
When I wrote the comment, I was confused about the units. I somehow thought
th
Franz,
Contributions to documentation is always welcomed :). A scan of the
persistence layer and journal docs would be really useful. Thanks
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:30 PM, nigro_franz wrote:
> An awesome work Clebert!
> And to everyone that has made this master filled of such great stuff :)
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms.ConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.Destination;
import javax.jms.JMSException;
import javax.jms.Message;
import javax.jms.MessageConsumer;
import javax.jms.MessageListener;
import javax.jms.MessageProducer;
import javax.jms.Session;
import javax.jms.Te
Cool
eheheh get some rest mate!!! :)
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-Artemis-2-x-stream-tp4721815p4723175.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Adding mmap journal to the docs is a great idea.
Also make sure the configs are current on the docs.
I won't do any work today (beyond this email :) )
Will help out tomorrow.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:36 AM nigro_franz wrote:
> An awesome work Clebert!
> And to everyone that has made thi
An awesome work Clebert!
And to everyone that has made this master filled of such great stuff :)
Martyn, do u need an hand on the doc?
In particular the journal type part is something that I was pretty involved
:P
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-
All,
As many of you are already aware, Apache Artemis has been developing some
great new features including a new and improved addressing model that lends
itself well to cross protocol and advance features like exclusive consumer
queues, configuration derived semantics for addresses and so on. The
Yes. There are users who reported issues that have been fixed and ported
to the 1.x branch. Let's get a 1.5.4 out the door asap to get these users
unblocked.
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:45 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:42 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > >>
> > >
Great work Clebert. I know this was a long hard slog. I'm going to send a
2.0.0 HEADSUP later today. I'm really excited to get all the great stuff
we've been doing on master into the hands of users.
I think now is a good time to revisit our documentation and examples to
ensure everything is up
26 matches
Mail list logo
