Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2113
Iâm not sure if this should be included in 2.7.0 or not yet. But
definitely not 2.6.1.
---
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2113
+1 for me as well
---
Github user andytaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2113
+1 for not changing the current behaviour
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2113
So RH docs shouldnt influence the upstream.
As i said im not against this change i just beleive its not suitable for
bug fix release, as it will be a change in current
GitHub user jostbg reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2113
[ARTEMIS-1890] Any-word wildcard fix
This patch fixes the reported bug, improves code readability and also
improves the performance of the matches function by storing immutable values
a
Github user jostbg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2113
---
Github user jostbg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2113
@michaelandrepearce I understand your concern that's why I mentioned the
docs may be wrong. Looking at
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_mrg/3/html/messaging_
