Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#discussion_r232560925
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/utils/collections/TypedProperties.java
---
@@ -318,6 +320,33 @@ public sync
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#discussion_r232590511
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/utils/collections/TypedProperties.java
---
@@ -318,6 +320,33 @@ public sync
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#discussion_r232654687
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/utils/collections/TypedProperties.java
---
@@ -318,6 +320,33 @@ pu
Github user TomasHofman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2287
Retest this please.
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2287
@TomasHofman you'll need to update your branch somehow to force the PR
build to run again. I recommend something like `git commit --amend` & `push
-f`.
---
Github user TomasHofman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2287
No automation? Thanks, will do. :)
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2287
The PR build is automated. You just need to update your branch so it knows
to test it again. A couple of git commands aren't really much harder than a
GitHub comment.
---
Github user TomasHofman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2287
Everything looks OK now, so I will wait for merging and porting to 2.6.x,
and then will update downstream PR for 2.6.3.jbossorg-x (will cherry-pick -x
from 2.6.x port).
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2423
@michaelandrepearce I agree, that expiry bit qualifies as a bug and should
also be fixed to disallow modification
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2423
Id disagree thats a very importand broker feature.
---
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2427#discussion_r232758121
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/utils/collections/TypedProperties.java
---
@@ -318,6 +320,33 @@ public sync
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2423
Any modification has to be on extra properties.
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2423
But then that would mean it would not show on JMS properties correctly .
Which it does today
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/315
---
Hi All,
We've merged into 5.15.x several major bug fixes affecting KahaDB:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7082
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7091
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7093
What would be regular procedure towards getting a 5.15.x patch train
moving forw
15 matches
Mail list logo
