Hi Christopher,
Agree for the Jira, my bad, I'm creating the Jira today for the tracking.
For 5.16.x, it sounds like a plan.
I will release 5.15.10 and then, I will move forward on 5.16.0
preparation with JDK 11 support (build and runtime).
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 14/05/2019 16:17, Christopher
Yes they were minor but we currently use Jira for the release notes so it's
good to have visibility to users know what changed.
Master is already on 5.16.0-SNAPSHOT. It's fine to do a 5.15.10 my point
is just that it's pretty clear we need to get 5.16.0 out the door if we are
already hitting 10
Couple of things:
1) This is the "dev" list for developers who are actually working on
ActiveMQ to discuss topics related directly to said development. You should
use the "user" list [1] for questions like this.
2) You should be getting the help you need on your Stack Overflow
questions [2].
I'm trying to get a higher speed for sending messages via ActiveMQ broker.
The problem is, that I don't get a great perfomence boost. It takes about 2
minutes 40 seconds to send 1 persistent messages from queue №1 to queue
№2 via my service. And it takes about 2 minutes 20 seconds to send
I'm trying to get a higher speed for sending messages via ActiveMQ broker.
The problem is, that I don't get a great perfomence boost. It takes about 2
minutes 40 seconds to send 1 persistent messages from queue №1 to queue
№2 via my service. And it takes about 2 minutes 20 seconds to send
Hi,
The PRs without Jira were minor, but I will create the corresponding
Jira anyway, at least for the tracking.
For the release, I propose the following:
1. Release 5.15.10 with the merge
2. Once 5.15.10 is released, I will create 5.16.x branch focus on JDK 11
support.
Thoughts ?
Also, one more thing, you merged a bunch of PRs today but none of them have
Jiras. We need to have Jiras for all of those so that we can track the
commits in the release notes.
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:34 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ooops, I read the
Ooops, I read the proposal as 5.15.0 not 5.15.10 :)
So I think my opinion probably stands either way. We could do a 5.15.10
but we really need to get 5.16.0 out the door and stop doing patch releases
on 5.15.x. The only thing holding back 5.16.0 is the JDK 11 support but
there's some nice
I assume you mean 5.16.0
I've probably mentioned this a few times in various posts and chat but my
opinion is we need to support JDK 11 so I consider this issue a blocker
until resolved. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7087
5.16.0 should still be compatible to run on JDK 8 or JDK 11
