On 5/30/19 2:39 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.9.0 release.
This is one of the smallest releases we've done. It includes a handful of
bug fixes, a few improvements, and one major new feature:
[ARTEMIS-2308] - Support exporting metrics
The rele
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 2:42 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> I probably would do one each, yes. Its the easiest separation, keeps
> things independent and focused from the start and can avoid various
> hassles later.
>
> I'd perhaps consider 'all stuff' aggregation (e.g foo =
> metrics), but really
I probably would do one each, yes. Its the easiest separation, keeps
things independent and focused from the start and can avoid various
hassles later.
I'd perhaps consider 'all stuff' aggregation (e.g foo =
metrics), but really I dont personally see the benefits as outweighing
the other things a
+1, having a vendor neutral approach for exporting metrics using micrometer
is a nice feature
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:02 PM Howard Gao wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:26 AM Clebert Suconic >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 [binding]
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 2:39 PM Justin Bertram
> > w
Please accept my apologies... I have been on so many channels all at
once that I overlooked into this.
it would be nice to make this simpler though. I have tried to get rid
of the documentation per previous version for instance (you can just
download the documentation with the zip).
On Fri, May 3
I agree with you, and that was my preference as well. I was trying to
understand if one git per component is what Robbie was suggesting.
Although there's an issue though, when you have one super git for many
independent components, how would you tag releases?
each fodler would be in fact an indep
I think one git repo per thing maybecome a bit too scattery. Id go for one repo
with multiple modules.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:42 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:25 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I would put them outwith
Yes it is, I even noted I found it was already documented when I went
to add one of the times I was reporting the issue.
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blame/2.8.1/RELEASING.md#L299
(The details are a touch stale now in referring to html of the old
site update process)
On Fri, 31 May
is that step in:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/RELEASING.md
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 12:29, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> I've found that the docs/downloads/etc links for recent releases on
> the past releases page are broken nearly every time I have used the
> page over the l
