Artemis releases are not appearing in Reporter

2019-07-10 Thread Bruce Snyder
While compiling the latest report for the ASF Board, I noticed that the Artemis releases are not appearing in the Releases section for ActiveMQ within https://reporter.apache.org/. Does anyone know what step(s) we might be missing that allows them to appear there? This is a problem that we definite

Re: Artemis releases are not appearing in Reporter

2019-07-10 Thread Justin Bertram
It appears to me that the releases have to be manually added to the report. I wasn't aware of this and haven't added this for any of the releases I've performed. Justin On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:55 AM Bruce Snyder wrote: > While compiling the latest report for the ASF Board, I noticed that th

Re: Artemis releases are not appearing in Reporter

2019-07-10 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Manually entered, or 'manually' imported from JIRA (note the optional version name prefix field, useful when projects have multiple JIRA instances for different components where version names would overlap each other if not prefixed). I manually enter things when releasing, I find its simpler in th

Re: apache-website checkout issues

2019-07-10 Thread michael . andre . pearce
Just a ping on this. Whilst i was able to make the change via github editor. I still need to checkout so i can perform a build and produce new site content. But the git clone issue im still struggling with. I am on windows not mac like i used to be incase thats a known issue Get Outloo

Re: Artemis releases are not appearing in Reporter

2019-07-10 Thread Bruce Snyder
I have never added any ActiveMQ releases to the report manually, they are typically just there already. Is this because someone else manually added them or is Reporter scraping this information from somewhere else? Bruce On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:15 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Manually entered,

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Fair enough. Anyway, I'm moving forward on 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation reviewing/fixing/merging. About the "roadmap", I will start a formal vote. Regards JB On 09/07/2019 12:08, Christopher Shannon wrote: > There was almost no discussion on the proposals for 5.x. Almost no one > resp

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-10 Thread michael . andre . pearce
Before any votes. I think it needs a little more discussion to see where the tide is going. You need to engage people in that discussion. Likewise i think a little more than just a line or two is needed for a proposal, need to be clear who is committing to what and thoughts about ensuring cl

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-10 Thread michael . andre . pearce
Like wise in a roadmap for our project we need to be also clear on the direction for Artemis. We definitely dont want to be flip flopping. We had spelt out a roadmap last year. The project already did one big flip flop with apollo. It erodes all end users trust, and they have no clear d