[ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 released !

2019-09-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.15.10. You can find more details on: https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-51510-release A big thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. We look forward to your feedback.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Awesome, thanks, I'm preparing the announcement e-mail. Regards JB On 20/09/2019 15:57, Christopher Shannon wrote: > website has been updated > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Robbie, >> >> It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-20 Thread Christopher Shannon
website has been updated On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Robbie, > > It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault, and it > won't happen for next one for sure ;) > > Regards > JB > > On 20/09/2019 11:09, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > As I said I w

Re: [DISCUSS] Artemis pageIterator.hasNext spends too much time in the case of no messages matched

2019-09-20 Thread yw yw
Thanks for suggestions. I will provide a PR soon :) michael.andre.pearce 于2019年9月20日周五 上午8:21写道: > This sounds like a reasonable pattern to me. Especially in an event based > architecture.As i noted in the other email. My main concern is being able > to keep the ability to detect dead or live lo

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Robbie, It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault, and it won't happen for next one for sure ;) Regards JB On 20/09/2019 11:09, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > As I said I wondered if that was the case, which is all good. I just > thought in case that wasnt the situation it wou

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-20 Thread Robbie Gemmell
So far as I know the published website is based only on the git repo now, and the old svn repo would have no effect on it. Looking at http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/ suggests that is true as theres no signof 5.15.10 files, so I think your PR needs to include those changes also. I'm surprise

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)

2019-09-20 Thread Robbie Gemmell
As I said I wondered if that was the case, which is all good. I just thought in case that wasnt the situation it would be helpful to ensure you knew the website updates can be / normally are pushed directly, to hopefully help avoid the release publishing process going past the 3 week mark. Robbie