It's the official name, isn't it? :)
What about this initiative? --> https://artemiscloud.io/
It seems promising.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:09 PM JB Onofré wrote:
> ActiveMQ (I still don’t like « classic » name ;)) not Artemis.
>
> > Le 17 août 2021 à 19:00, Havret a écrit :
> >
> > Does it
ActiveMQ (I still don’t like « classic » name ;)) not Artemis.
> Le 17 août 2021 à 19:00, Havret a écrit :
>
> Does it apply to Artemis as well, or only to Classic?
>
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:29 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>>
>> Hello Havret-
>>
>> Yes, I am still planning a PR for the D
Does it apply to Artemis as well, or only to Classic?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:29 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> Hello Havret-
>
> Yes, I am still planning a PR for the Docker image shortly. A number of
> prerequisite fixes went in recently as part of the 5.16.3 release (maven
> plugin versions,
By removing 5.16.2 from the dist area before the site is being updated
for 5.16.3 you will have broken some of the download links on the site
again.
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 06:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> This vote passed with the following result:
>
> +1 (binding): JB Onof
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3420 and
created a related PR at
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3696 for this.
I think it is time to move on requiring Java 11 for future releases,
and just after a release is a great time to get going on it.
It has now
